uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revealing the Man behind the Curtain: Proving Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

There is unanimity within the arbitration community that corruption is disrupting international trade and that arbitrators must not let arbitration be a safe forum for enforcement of contracts tainted by such illicit acts. Due to the hidden nature of corruption, often hiding behind an agency agreement, the most challenging question facing arbitrators has shown to be how to handle the rules of evidence. Awards show that there is an inconsistency in the treatment of the burden and standard of proof as well as the significance given to circumstantial evidence. Two trends can be spotted where the first approach is to argue that the seriousness of the accusations calls for a heightened standard of proof. The second trend is to argue that the seriousness to the contrary calls for a pragmatic approach to the rules of evidence, allowing a less rigid view on the standard of proof and use of circumstantial evidence or even a shift in the burden of proof.

The focus of the thesis is on evidentiary aspects of corruption cases and how arbitrators have dealt with these challenges. The overall question is how arbitrators should handle the rules of evidence in corruption cases from a lege ferenda perspective. It is argued that the inconsistency in the handling of proof is sometimes misguided and that there are reasons to agree on a common starting point for applying the rules of evidence to corruption cases. Arbitrators should realise the frightening fact that it is their weighing of the evidence which is usually decisive for the outcome and accordingly there is a responsibility to conduct this operation carefully. The tools and procedural flexibility to reveal corruption exist even if there is no perfect solution on how to do it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 61 p.
Keyword [en]
international arbitration, corruption, evidence, standard of proof, burden of proof, bribery
Keyword [sv]
internationellt skiljeförfarande, korruption, mutor, bevis, beviskrav, bevisbörda
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-241752OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-241752DiVA: diva2:781422
Educational program
Law Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-03-06 Created: 2015-01-16 Last updated: 2015-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(879 kB)381 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 879 kBChecksum SHA-512
bcaab5f69009b434759566ea08ed8a6c470ab1e5040a95a891623499aafa9fe9e5137a4eb81d6666e4c4290c60f892935e547619ca639aca3cfb73adcb93440a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 381 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1001 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf