uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of the appropriateness of extemporaneous preparations prescribed in Swedish primary care
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.
1996 (English)In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, ISSN 0961-7671, E-ISSN 2042-7174, Vol. 4, no 2, 117-122 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Extemporaneous preparations are drugs that are compounded for individual patients or made in larger batches for stock-keeping. This study aimed to assess the prescribing of extemporaneous preparations in Swedish primary care, both therapeutically and pharmaceutically. An analysis of the extent to which alternative commercial drugs were available at the time of the prescription was also conducted.

Information was taken from the Swedish diagnosis and therapy survey for the time period October, 1986, to September, 1988, inclusive. This survey collects from a random sample of physicians the details of all prescriptions they write during one week, as well as the corresponding diagnoses. The present study analysed the 1,043 extemporaneous prescriptions written during that period.

The majority (62 per cent) were considered to be therapeutically appropriate in that they formed recommended treatment for the diagnosis in question according to the medical literature. Another 15 per cent were neither recommended nor questioned in the consulted sources; 20 per cent were designated as controversial because they were recommended in some sources and questioned in others. About 3.5 per cent were considered to be therapeutically inappropriate, ie, the literature suggested that their use should be abandoned. One per cent were pharmaceutically inappropriate. Many preparations probably could have been replaced by commercial alternatives, about half differing from available commercial alternatives only by strength and/or vehicle. Whether substitutions could have been made in practice would depend on the clinical picture in the individual patient case.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1996. Vol. 4, no 2, 117-122 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-50400DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.1996.tb00852.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-50400DiVA: diva2:78308
Available from: 2008-10-17 Created: 2008-10-17 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Kettis, ÅsaIsacson, Dag

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kettis, ÅsaIsacson, Dag
By organisation
Department of Pharmacy
In the same journal
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 333 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf