uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Developing and Evaluating a Survey for Representational Fluency in Science
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Physics Didactics. (Physics Education Research)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3244-2586
2014 (English)In: International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, ISSN 1836-0858, E-ISSN 1836-0866, Vol. 22, no 5, 22-42 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Various representations, used for communication and problem solving in science, are an unspoken prerequisite for learning, understanding, and participating in scientific communities. Work has been done highlighting the importance of competence in particular multiple representations in science learning, the specific representational practices for the different disciplines, and to translating between representations. However, limited attention has been paid to obtaining a threshold level of ability in, not only one, but some combination of representations for a discipline. This notion leads to generic fluency with various representational forms used in science, with discipline specific expertise – representational fluency nuanced for a particular discipline. The aim of this study is to examine representational fluency nuanced for physics. This is achieved through the development of a survey instrument, the Representational Fluency Survey (RFS), consisting of representationally rich multiple choice items obtained predominantly from various validated sources. The survey was implemented with 334 students from first year to postgraduate at an Australian university to capture a cross-sectional snapshot of representational fluency nuanced for the specialization of physics. Reliability and validity were determined through standard statistical analysis and through consultation with experts. The results show that representation fluency develops across the years, and that there is a threshold associated with fluency. However, our study does not comment on causality. We demonstrate that in coalescing existing research on multiple representation while paying attention to disciplinary differences is a potentially fruitful pursuit. The RFS test of representational fluency in science is tailored to be used with university physics students but illustrates that adaption for other specializations may be possible.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 22, no 5, 22-42 p.
National Category
Other Physics Topics Educational Sciences
Research subject
Physics with specialization in Physics Education
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-243560OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-243560DiVA: diva2:787565
Available from: 2015-02-10 Created: 2015-02-10 Last updated: 2015-04-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(929 kB)53 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 929 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Airey, John
By organisation
Physics Didactics
In the same journal
International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education
Other Physics TopicsEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 53 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 268 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link