uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Five-year Nationwide Follow-up Study of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: European Urology, ISSN 0302-2838, E-ISSN 1873-7560, Vol. 67, no 2, 233-238 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is an important yet underutilized strategy to reduce prostate cancer (PCa) overtreatment. Objective: To examine the 5-yr outcomes of AS in a population-based setting. Design, setting, and participants: From the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, we identified 11 726 men <= 70 yr diagnosed with very low-risk to intermediate-risk PCa from 2003 to 2007 who completed 5 yr of follow-up. Of these men, 1729 (15%) chose AS for the primary management strategy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We calculated the probability of discontinuation of AS over time, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine factors associated with discontinuation. Reasons for discontinuation were assessed by data extraction from medical charts. Results and limitations: By 5 yr, 64% of the men remained on AS. Predictors of discontinuation were younger age, fewer comorbidities, more education, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and clinical stage T2 disease; marital status did not predict discontinuation. In a subset with data on the reason for discontinuation (86%), 20% of men discontinued because of patient preference, 52% because of PSA progression, 24% because of biopsy progression, and 3% for other reasons. Conclusions: In a population-based setting, the majority of men remained on AS at 5 yr. However, one-fifth of the men who discontinued AS did so for nonbiologic reasons. Thus, there is a need for support and counseling for men to continue AS in the absence of signs of progression to improve adherence to AS and decrease overtreatment. Patient summary: Active surveillance (AS) is an important option to delay or avoid treatment for men with favorable prostate cancer features. This study shows that at 5 yr, 64% of men across an entire population remained on AS. We concluded that AS is a durable option and that counseling may be useful to promote adherence for men without progression. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 67, no 2, 233-238 p.
Keyword [en]
Prostate cancer, Active surveillance, Adverse pathology, Predictors, Upgrading
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-243423DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.010ISI: 000347033500024OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-243423DiVA: diva2:788947
Available from: 2015-02-17 Created: 2015-02-09 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Bill-Axelson, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bill-Axelson, Anna
By organisation
Urology
In the same journal
European Urology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 491 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf