uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do cardiologists follow the European guidelines for cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy?: Results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology-Arrhythmia.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Europace, ISSN 1099-5129, E-ISSN 1532-2092, Vol. 17, no 1, 148-151 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) EP wire survey was to evaluate the implementation of the current guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Europe. A total of 48 centres replied to the survey, 34 of them (71%) were university hospitals. All responding centres implement CRT in patients with classical indications, i.e. sinus rhythm, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or ambulatory IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35%, and left bundle-branch block (LBBB) with QRS duration >150 ms, while 31 centres (67%) would implant a CRT device in patients with the same characteristics but with a non-LBBB pattern. Forty-one centres (89%) would also implant CRT in patients with sinus rhythm, NYHA Class II, III, or ambulatory IV, LVEF <35%, and LBBB with QRS duration between 120 and 150 ms, while only eight centres (17%) would implant the device in patients with the same characteristics but with a non-LBBB pattern. In patients with LVEF <35% and QRS duration below 120 ms, the majority of the centres (80%) would implant a single- or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, but in nine cases (20%) no device was considered to be indicated. The results of this survey showed a good adherence to some of the current recommendations. Still some reluctance exists when offering the device therapy to patients with QRS duration in the lower range.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 17, no 1, 148-151 p.
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Research subject
Cardiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-244979DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu395ISI: 000351603900028PubMedID: 25552672OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-244979DiVA: diva2:790186
Available from: 2015-02-23 Created: 2015-02-23 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Sciaraffia, ElenaBlomström-Lundqvist, Carina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sciaraffia, ElenaBlomström-Lundqvist, Carina
By organisation
Cardiology-Arrhythmia
In the same journal
Europace
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 358 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf