uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Annals of Surgery, ISSN 0003-4932, E-ISSN 1528-1140, Vol. 258, no 1, 37-45 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: : The aim of the trial was to compare laparoscopic technique with open technique regarding short-term pain, quality of life (QoL), recovery, and complications.

BACKGROUND: : Laparoscopic and open techniques for incisional hernia repair are recognized treatment options with pros and cons.

METHODS: : Patients from 7 centers with a midline incisional hernia of a maximum width of 10 cm were randomized to either laparoscopic (LR) or open sublay (OR) mesh repair. Primary end point was pain at 3 weeks, measured as the bodily pain subscale of Short Form-36 (SF-36). Secondary end points were complications registered by type and severity (the Clavien-Dindo classification), movement restrictions, fatigue, time to full recovery, and QoL up to 8 weeks.

RESULTS: : Patients were recruited between October 2005 and November 2009. Of 157 randomized patients, 133 received intervention: 64 LR and 69 OR. Measurements of pain did not differ, nor did movement restriction and postoperative fatigue. SF-36 subscales favored the LR group: physical function (P < 0.001), role physical (P < 0.012), mental health (P < 0.022), and physical composite score (P < 0.009). Surgical site infections were 17 in the OR group compared with 1 in the LR group (P < 0.001). The severity of complications did not differ between the groups (P < 0.213).

CONCLUSIONS: : Postoperative pain or recovery at 3 weeks after repair of midline incisional hernias does not differ between LR and OR, but the LR results in better physical function and less surgical site infections than the OR does. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00472537).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 258, no 1, 37-45 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-246299DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fe1b2PubMedID: 23629524OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-246299DiVA: diva2:792772
Available from: 2015-03-05 Created: 2015-03-05 Last updated: 2015-03-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Centre for Clinical Research, County of Västmanland
In the same journal
Annals of Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 154 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link