uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Grey literature – grey sources?: Nuancing the view on professional documentation: the case of Swedish archaeology
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of ALM. (ARKDIS)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0493-6845
2015 (Swedish)In: Journal of Documentation, ISSN 0022-0418, E-ISSN 1758-7379, Vol. 71, no 6, 1158-1182 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


This study aims at nuancing the perception about professional documentation (a.k.a. ‘grey literature’), assuming perception of documentation being a cultural aspect of accessibility.


The study explores variations within the archaeological report genre through a bibliometric analysis of source use. Source characteristics are explored as well as correlations between report authors and source originators. Statistical frequency distribution is complemented by a correspondence analysis and a k-Means cluster analysis to explore patterns. The patterns are interpreted as ‘frames of references’ and related to circumstances for archaeological work. The study also discusses source representations.


The source use patterns reveal a latent variation, not visible in the general analysis: a professional/academic frame of reference (mainly among authors affiliated with incorporated businesses and sole proprietorships) and an administrative frame of reference (mainly among authors affiliated with government agencies, foundations and member associations) emerge.

Research limitations/implications

The study focuses on Swedish field evaluation reports. Future research could 1) test the results in relation to other types of reports, and 2) go beyond the document perspective to explore source use in documentation practices.

Social implications

The results on variations in frames of references among report writers have implication for report readers and user. The results should also be considered in archaeology management and policy-making. On the level of source representation the results call for clarifications of vague representations and possibly omitted sources.


This study contextualises archaeological information use and focuses on variations in professional archaeology which has received little previous research attention. The bibliometric approach complements previous qualitative studies of archaeological information.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 71, no 6, 1158-1182 p.
Keyword [en]
Documentation; Reports; Grey literature; Information sources; Information use: Referencing; Bibliometrics; Sociology of professions; Archaeology
National Category
Information Studies
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-246514DOI: 10.1108/JD-09-2014-0137ISI: 000369171600003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-246514DiVA: diva2:793583
Swedish Research Council, 340-2012-5751
Available from: 2015-03-08 Created: 2015-03-08 Last updated: 2016-10-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Grey literature – grey sources? Accepted version(522 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 522 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textDataset

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Börjesson, Lisa
By organisation
Department of ALM
In the same journal
Journal of Documentation
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 770 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link