uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Efficency of organized and oppurtunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Genetics and Pathology.
Show others and affiliations
1995 (English)In: British Journal of Cancer, ISSN 0007-0920, Vol. 72, no 2, 498-505 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality can be reduced by removal of precursor lesions detected at cytological screening. Organised screening, i.e. regular invitation of defined target groups, is generally considered more effective than opportunistic screening. The latter method however, is predominant in most settings. There is no scientific basis for advocating one type of screening or the other. Our aim was to compare the two types and to analyse their efficiency. We analysed 466,275 smears taken in an open cohort of 118,890 women during 1969-88. A computerised database permitted standardised classification of all smears and complete ascertainment of cancer in situ through record linkage. The number of in situ cancers detected per 1000 smears, the detection ratio, was used as an outcome measure both in univariate analyses and in multivariate logistic regression models. Cancer in situ was detected in 1076 women in the study cohort, with a detection ratio of 3.0 at organised and 2.1 at opportunistic screening, yielding an unadjusted odds ratio of 0.69 (95% CI 0.61-0.79). After adjustment for age and time period, the probability of detecting cancer in situ was around 25% higher with opportunistic than with organised screening (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.46). This difference in favour of opportunistic screening was most pronounced in the first 10 year period and disappeared during the last decade. The difference in efficiency between organised and opportunistic screening in the detection of cancer in situ was slight, if any. The dogma that organised screening is significantly more efficient than the opportunistic type needs reconsideration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1995. Vol. 72, no 2, 498-505 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-51940PubMedID: 7640239OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-51940DiVA: diva2:79849
Available from: 2008-10-17 Created: 2008-10-17 Last updated: 2009-11-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Genetics and Pathology
In the same journal
British Journal of Cancer
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 168 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link