uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD).
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Biochemial structure and function.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMC Pulmonary Medicine, ISSN 1471-2466, E-ISSN 1471-2466, Vol. 15, 60Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Protective ventilation with lower tidal volume (VT) and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduces the negative additive effects of mechanical ventilation during systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesised that protective ventilation during surgery would affect the organ-specific immune response in an experimental animal model of endotoxin-induced sepsis-like syndrome.

METHODS: 30 pigs were laparotomised for 2 hours (h), after which a continuous endotoxin infusion was started at 0.25 micrograms × kg(-1) × h(-1) for 5 h. Catheters were placed in the carotid artery, hepatic vein, portal vein and jugular bulb. Animals were randomised to two protective ventilation groups (n = 10 each): one group was ventilated with VT 6 mL × kg(-1) during the whole experiment while the other group was ventilated during the surgical phase with VT of 10 mL × kg(-1). In both groups PEEP was 5 cmH2O during surgery and increased to 10 cmH2O at the start of endotoxin infusion. A control group (n = 10) was ventilated with VT of 10 mL × kg(-1) and PEEP 5 cm H20 throughout the experiment. In four sample locations we a) simultaneously compared cytokine levels, b) studied the effect of protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia and c) evaluated protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine levels.

RESULTS: TNF-alpha levels were highest in the hepatic vein, IL-6 levels highest in the artery and jugular bulb and IL-10 levels lowest in the artery. Protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia did not differ in organ-specific cytokine levels. Protective ventilation led to lower levels of TNF-alpha in the hepatic vein compared with the control group, whereas no significant differences were seen in the artery, portal vein or jugular bulb.

CONCLUSIONS: Variation between organs in cytokine output was observed during experimental sepsis. We see no implication from cytokine levels for initiating protective ventilation before endotoxemia. However, during endotoxemia protective ventilation attenuates hepatic inflammatory cytokine output contributing to a reduced total inflammatory burden.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 15, 60
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-253174DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0052-9ISI: 000354840700001PubMedID: 25958003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-253174DiVA: diva2:813590
Available from: 2015-05-23 Created: 2015-05-23 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Inflammatory and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Models
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Inflammatory and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Models
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Severe infections, trauma or major surgery can each cause a state of systemic inflammation. These causes for systemic inflammation often coexist and complicate each other. Mechanical ventilation is commonly used during major surgical procedures and when respiratory functions are failing in the intensive care setting. Although necessary, the use of mechanical ventilation can cause injury to the lungs and other organs especially under states of systemic inflammation. Moreover, a course of mechanical ventilator therapy can be complicated by ventilator-associated pneumonia, a factor greatly influencing mortality. The efforts to avoid additional ventilator-induced injury to patients are embodied in the expression ‘protective ventilation’.

With the use of pig models we have examined the impact of protective ventilation on systemic inflammation, on organ-specific inflammation and on bacterial growth during pneumonia. Additionally, with a 30-hour ventilator-associated pneumonia model we examined the influence of mechanical ventilation and systemic inflammation on bacterial growth. Systemic inflammation was initiated with surgery and enhanced with endotoxin. The bacterium used was Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We found that protective ventilation during systemic inflammation attenuated the systemic inflammatory cytokine responses and reduced secondary organ damage. Moreover, the attenuated inflammatory responses were seen on the organ specific level, most clearly as reduced counts of inflammatory cytokines from the liver. Protective ventilation entailed lower bacterial counts in lung tissue after 6 hours of pneumonia. Mechanical ventilation for 24 h, before a bacterial challenge into the lungs, increased bacterial counts in lung tissue after 6 h. The addition of systemic inflammation by endotoxin during 24 h increased the bacterial counts even more. For comparison, these experiments used control groups with clinically common ventilator settings.

Summarily, these results support the use of protective ventilation as a means to reduce systemic inflammation and organ injury, and to optimize bacterial clearance in states of systemic inflammation and pneumonia.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2016. 84 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 1208
Keyword
Mechanical ventilation, Systemic inflammation, Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Endotoxin
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-282602 (URN)978-91-554-9546-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-05-28, Scenkonst Sörmland, John Engellaus Gata 3, 633 42, Eskilstuna, 09:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-05-02 Created: 2016-04-05 Last updated: 2016-05-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Sperber, JesperLipcsey, MiklósLarsson, AndersLarsson, AndersSjölin, JanCastegren, Markus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sperber, JesperLipcsey, MiklósLarsson, AndersLarsson, AndersSjölin, JanCastegren, Markus
By organisation
Infectious DiseasesCentrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD)Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareBiochemial structure and function
In the same journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 516 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf