The rhetoric and prose of the human/animal contrast
2015 (English)In: Language & Communication, ISSN 0271-5309, E-ISSN 1873-3395, Vol. 42, 36-49 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
The opposition in philosophy between humans as thinkers and animals as non-thinkers is often considered to stem from anthropocentrism. In this paper I try to demonstrate that philosophers don't really place "us" at the centre, but rather their own thinking and the philosophical language they develop as thinkers. The human/animal contrast functions rhetorically to communicate that philosophical self-centredness to an audience that recognises itself as "human." I try to dismantle the contrast between humans and animals by exposing what I see as its true core: forgetfulness of how philosophical language (and thinking in that language) is generated by idealisation and sublimation of the reflexive uses of language.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 42, 36-49 p.
Rationality, Reflexivity, Philosophy, Humans, Animals
General Language Studies and Linguistics Communication Studies
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-253240DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.03.001ISI: 000353855700005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-253240DiVA: diva2:822717