uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
In defence of the criticism of the Defence Mechanism Test (DMT): A reply to Kragh (1998)
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
1999 (English)In: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, ISSN 0036-5564, Vol. 40, no 1, 85-87 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Kragh (Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1998, 39, 123-124) criticises a recent empirical study of the Defence Mechanism Test (DMT) conducted by the present authors (Zuber & Ekehammar, 1997) concerning methodological and other shortcomings. The present

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell , 1999. Vol. 40, no 1, 85-87 p.
Keyword [en]
DMT; defence mechanisms; projective tests
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-55128OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-55128DiVA: diva2:83036
Note
Addresses: Ekehammar B, Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 1225, SE-75142 Stockholm, Sweden. Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-75142 Stockholm, Sweden. Swedish Inst Cognit Psychotherapy, Stockholm, Sweden.Available from: 2008-10-17 Created: 2008-10-17 Last updated: 2011-01-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 363 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf