uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Bright white light therapy in depression: A critical review of the evidence
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, University Hospital.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Affective Disorders, ISSN 0165-0327, E-ISSN 1573-2517, Vol. 182, 1-7 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Light therapy is an accepted treatment option, at least for seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Our aim was to critically evaluate treatment effects of bright white light (BWL) on the depressive symptoms in both SAD and non-seasonal depression. Methods: The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched (December 1974 through June 2014) for randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals. Study quality was assessed with a checklist developed by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Only studies with high or medium quality were used in the meta-analyses. Results: Eight studies of SAD and two studies of non-seasonal depression met inclusion and quality criteria. Effects on SAD were estimated in two meta-analyses. In the first, week by week, BWL reached statistical significance only at two and three weeks of treatment (Standardized Mean Difference, SMD: -0.50 (-CI 0.94, -0.05); -0.31 (-0.59, -0.03) respectively). The second meta-analysis, of endpoint data only, showed a SMD of -0.54 (CI, -0.95, -0.13), which indicates an advantage for BWL. No meta-analysis was performed for non-seasonal depression due to heterogeneity between studies. Limitations: This analysis is restricted to short-term effects of BWL measured as mean changes in scores derived from SIGH-SAD, SIGH-SAD self-report, or HDRS rating scales. Conclusions: Most studies of BWL have considerable methodological problems, and the results of published meta-analyses are highly dependent on the study selection. Even though quality criteria are introduced in the selection procedures of studies, when the results are carefully scrutinized, the evidence is not unequivocal.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 182, 1-7 p.
Keyword [en]
Light therapy, Depression, Meta-analysis, Review
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-258908DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.013ISI: 000356359700001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-258908DiVA: diva2:842660
Swedish Research Council, 15231
Available from: 2015-07-21 Created: 2015-07-21 Last updated: 2015-07-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berglund, LarsEkselius, Lisa
By organisation
UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research CenterPsychiatry, University Hospital
In the same journal
Journal of Affective Disorders

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 165 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link