uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
SPECIES-SPECIFIC ANTIPREDATOR CAPACITIES AND PREY REFUGES - INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PISCIVOROUS PERCH (PERCA-FLUVIATILIS) AND JUVENILE PERCH AND ROACH (RUTILUS-RUTILUS)
Umeå University, Department of Animal Ecology.
Umeå University, Department of Animal Ecology.
1995 (English)In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, ISSN 0340-5443, E-ISSN 1432-0762, Vol. 37, no 3, 169-178 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The outcome of predator-prey interactions depends on the characteristics of predators and prey as well as the structure of the environment. In a replicated field enclosure experiment, we tested the effects of quantity and quality of different prey refuges (no structure, structure forming a partial refuge, and structure forming a complete refuge) on the interaction between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus). We quantified the behaviour of the predators and the prey and predator-induced prey mortality. The piscivores stayed in or close to the prey refuge and were more dispersed in the presence than in the absence of prey refuges. Survival of juvenile perch and roach decreased in the presence of predators and was higher for juvenile roach than for juvenile perch. In addition, juvenile perch survival increased with refuge efficiency. Roach formed schools which were denser in the presence of predators, had a higher swimming speed (both in the open water and in the refuge) and used a larger area than juvenile perch. Both prey species decreased their distance to the prey refuge and increased the proportion of their time spent in the refuge in the presence of predators. The number of switches between the open-water habitat and the prey refuge was higher for juvenile roach than for juvenile perch. Juvenile perch used different parts of the prey refuge in a flexible way depending both on presence of predators and refuge type whereas juvenile roach used the different parts of the prey refuge in fixed proportions over all refuge treatments. Our results suggest that juvenile roach had a overall higher capacity to avoid predation than juvenile perch. However, in the presence of qualitatively different prey refuges juvenile perch responded to predators with more flexible refuge use than juvenile roach. The differences in antipredator capacities of juvenile perch and roach when subjected to piscivorous perch predation may depend on differences in life history patterns of the two species.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1995. Vol. 37, no 3, 169-178 p.
Keyword [en]
ANTIPREDATOR CAPACITY, PREDATOR-PREY, PREY REFUGE USE, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-266398DOI: 10.1007/BF00176714ISI: A1995RW01300005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-266398DiVA: diva2:867958
Available from: 2015-11-08 Created: 2015-11-08 Last updated: 2017-12-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Eklöv, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eklöv, Peter
In the same journal
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 255 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf