uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures-Quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score ≥33
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Injury, ISSN 0020-1383, E-ISSN 1879-0267, Vol. 47, no 2, 395-401 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIMS: Both retroperitoneal pelvic packing and primary angioembolization are widely used to control haemorrhage related to pelvic fractures. It is still unknown which protocol is the safest. The primary aim of this study is to compare survival and complications of pelvic packing and angioembolization in massive haemorrhage related to pelvic fractures.

METHODS: Patients with haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were quasi-randomized to either pelvic packing (PACK) or angiography (ANGIO) using the time of admission as separator. Physiological markers of haemorrhage, time to intervention, procedure/surgical time, transfusion requirements, complications and early mortality were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS: 29 patients were randomized to PACK and 27 patients to ANGIO. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) in the ANGIO group was lower than in the PACK group (43±7 vs 48±6) (p<0.01). The median time from admission to angiography for the ANGIO group was 102min (range 76-214), and longer than 77min (range 43-125) from admission to surgery for the PACK group (p<0.01). The procedure time for the ANGIO group was 84min (range 62-105); while the surgical time was 60min (range 41-92) for the PACK group (p<0.001). The ANGIO group received 6.4 units packed red blood cells (range 4-10) in the first 24h after angiography. The PACK group required 5.2 units (range 3-10) in the first 24h after leaving the operating theatre (p=0.124). 9 patients in the ANGIO group underwent pelvic packing for persistent bleeding. 6 patients in the PACK group required pelvic angiography after pelvic packing for ongoing hypotension following packing (p=0.353). 5 patients in the ANGIO group died (2 from exsanguination), while 4 in the PACK group died (none from exsanguination) (p=0.449). Complications occurred without differences in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angioembolization, pelvic packing has shorter time to intervention and surgical time. Thus pelvic packing is the more rapid treatment of severe pelvic trauma than pelvic angioembolization. It is suitable for patients with haemodynamic instability at centers where the interventional radiology staff is not in-house at all times.

REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02535624) and ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN91713422).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 47, no 2, 395-401 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Surgery
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-266598DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.008ISI: 000370283300017PubMedID: 26508436OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-266598DiVA: diva2:868344
Available from: 2015-11-10 Created: 2015-11-10 Last updated: 2016-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Robinson, Yohan
By organisation
In the same journal
Medical and Health SciencesAnesthesiology and Intensive CareSurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 118 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link