uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Approaches to Access: Ideas and Practices for Facilitating Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the Areas of the Loser Pays Principle, Legal Aid, and Criteria for Injunctions
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2011 (English)Report (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
Abstract [en]

This report represents a step towards meeting the goal of the Aarhus Convention Access to Justice Task Force to develop a set of good practices and analyses on three priority issues:

· The loser pays principle

Article 9(4) of the Aarhus Convention requires that procedures for obtaining access to justice must not be prohibitively expensive. In some legal systems, the loser of an administrative or judicial action must pay all, or a portion of, the winner's litigation costs. These costs may include court fees, attorney fees, witness fees, and various other types of expenses. The loser pays principle may lead to an inability to control or even predict exposure to risk, and thus unreasonably deter public interest environmental litigation. Good practices in this category are those that help potential public interest claimants manage their risk and prevent environmental legal procedures from becoming prohibitively expensive.

· Legal aid and other methods of funding for public interest lawyers and NGOs

One way in which many countries address the requirement that procedures not be prohibitively expensive is to provide legal aid, or some other method of funding. Good practices in this category are those that enable meritorious environmental disputes to proceed when potential claimants lack the funds to pursue claims on their own.

· Criteria for injunctions

Article 9(4) of the Aarhus Convention requires that access to justice procedures provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief. To be effective, procedures must provide a means for actually stopping an environmentally harmful activity or illegal administrative decision. Without the ability to obtain injunctive relief, serious and irreversible damage may occur before the legal dispute is decided. Good practices in this category are those that facilitate injunctive relief leading to an effective level of environmental protection.

This report was commissioned for the 4th Aarhus Convention Meeting of the Parties 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 24 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-267925OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-267925DiVA: diva2:874845
Available from: 2015-11-29 Created: 2015-11-29 Last updated: 2015-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4297 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4297 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Epstein, Yaffa
By organisation
Department of Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 259 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link