uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Methodological aspects of the evaluationof endotelium-dependent vasodilatation in the human forearm
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
1998 (English)In: Clinical Physiology, ISSN 0144-5979, E-ISSN 1365-2281, Vol. 18, no 2, 81 p.81-87 p.Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

The present study, involving 56 healthy subjects from a health screening, was undertaken to address some methodological questions regarding the measurement of endothelial function using local intra-arterial infusions of metacholine (2 and 5 micrograms min-1) to evaluate endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 5 and 10 micrograms min-1) to evaluate endothelium-independent vasodilatation. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. The ratio of FBF during the highest dose of metacholine to FBF during the highest dose of SNP was used as an index of endothelial function. In 10 young volunteers the procedure was repeated after 2 h and again after 3 weeks in order to study short-term and long-term reproducibility of the method. Neither the vasodilatatory response to metacholine (r = 0.006) nor that to SNP (r = 0.08) was related to resting FBF. Neither the circumference nor the length of the arm was related to endothelial function (r = 0.01-0.11), as evaluated by the FBF on metacholine to nitroprusside ratio (mean 1.3 +/- 0.3 SD). The use of a wrist cuff to exclude hand circulation, or not, did not influence the evaluation of endothelial function significantly. Maximal FBF after 3 min of arterial occlusion of the forearm was significantly related to blood flow during both metacholine (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) and nitroprusside infusion (r = 0.36, P < 0.05), but not to the FBF on metacholine to nitroprusside ratio (r = 0.01). The short-term and long-term reproducibility of FBF during vasodilatation with metacholine and SNP was good (r = 0.89-0.97, P < 0.001), while the individual measurements for resting FBF were less reproducible when repeated after 3 weeks (r = 0.34). In conclusion, endothelial function was not related to resting FBF, nor to the arm circumference or length. No major difference was seen whether endothelial function was evaluated with or without exclusion of the hand circulation. Maximal FBF during reactive hyperaemia was not related to endothelial function.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1998. Vol. 18, no 2, 81 p.81-87 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-60527DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1998.00077.xPubMedID: 9568345OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-60527DiVA: diva2:88439
Available from: 2008-10-17 Created: 2008-10-17 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Department of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Clinical Physiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 310 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf