uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire and primary healthcare nurses' attitudes towards research and use of research findings.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 28, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: This article investigates attitudes towards and awareness of research and use of research findings among primary healthcare nurses, determinants of attitudes and evaluation of psychometric properties of an instrument measuring nurses' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: The production of new knowledge is ongoing and the amount of research of relevance for health care has increased, but there remains a gap between what is known and what is done in practice. To enhance evidence-based practice and patient safety, the use of research findings needs to be encouraged and promoted.

METHOD: An explanatory study using a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2005-2006. The survey included items about background data and the instrument attitudes towards and awareness of research and development in nursing. 1054 nurses participated in the study. Factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were used to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency of the instrument.

RESULT: The nurses generally held positive attitudes towards research. Although most of the nurses reported using research in practice, 37% claimed that they never or rarely used research findings. Half of the respondents perceived they had the ability to analyse scientific reports/articles. This ability and research use were significant determinants of attitudes. Factor analysis of the scale resulted in a three-factor solution, which differs from the seven-factor structure previously identified by the originators of the instrument.

CONCLUSION: Our results support the view that implementation of research is a complex process involving several factors. The different factor structure identified suggests that further work is needed on this instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 28, no 1
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-273842DOI: 10.1111/scs.12037PubMedID: 23517064OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-273842DiVA: diva2:895235
Available from: 2016-01-18 Created: 2016-01-18 Last updated: 2016-01-18

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 34 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link