uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Robustness and Precision: How Data Quality May Influence Key Dependent Variables in Infant Eye-Tracker Analyses
University of Tampere. (Infant Cognition Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0208-4212
2014 (English)In: Infancy, ISSN 1525-0008, E-ISSN 1532-7078, Vol. 19, no 5, 427-460 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In recent years, eye-tracking has become a popular method for drawing conclusions about infant cognition. Relatively little attention has been paid, however, to methodological issues associated with infant eye-tracking. Here, we consider the possibility that systematic differences in the quality of raw eye-tracking data obtained from different populations and individuals might create the impression of differences in gaze behavior, without this actually being the case. First, we show that lower quality eye-tracking data are obtained from populations who are younger and populations who are more fidgety and that data quality declines during the testing session. Second, we assess how these differences in data quality might influence key dependent variables in eye-tracking analyses. We show that lower precision data can appear to suggest a reduced likelihood to look at the eyes in a face relative to the mouth. We also show that less robust tracking may manifest as slower reaction time latencies (e.g., time to first fixation). Finally, we show that less robust data can manifest as shorter first look/visit duration. We argue that data quality should be reported in all analyses of infant eye-tracking data and/or that steps should be taken to control for data quality before performing final analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 19, no 5, 427-460 p.
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-276461DOI: 10.1111/infa.12055OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-276461DiVA: diva2:903082
Available from: 2016-02-13 Created: 2016-02-13 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1326 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1326 kBChecksum SHA-512
27be515ceda0702b80227b2c6162b6781dc101efad83af435a40ed9c3227e7f48707af72839915e50891969b3976273e2065b60e1ea10ca542f865b978797ba7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Forssman, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forssman, Linda
In the same journal
Infancy
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 46 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 206 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf