uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is a reliable alternative in slim patients
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery. Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, London, England.
Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, London, England.
Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, London, England.
Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, London, England.
2016 (English)In: Microsurgery, ISSN 0738-1085, E-ISSN 1098-2752, Vol. 36, no 7, 552-558 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: For slim patients eligible to breast reconstruction, clinical concerns exist on availability of adequate amount of donor tissue to restore breast volume and challenges in donor-site closure, when using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. The purpose of the current study is to analyze whether the DIEP flap can provide adequate volume for breast reconstruction in slim patients, without increased complication rates or prolonged hospital stay.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients receiving a unilateral DIEP breast reconstruction at the center 2007-2010 were included (n = 171). The patients were analyzed in subgroups of delayed and immediate reconstruction and of BMI. Complications were analyzed according to Clavien-Dindo. Flap weight was compared to mastectomy specimen weight among immediate reconstructions (n = 91).

RESULTS: There was no difference in specimen to flap weight ratio between the different BMI-groups (BMI <25, 25-29.9 and >30: 0.81, 0.87 and 0.96 respectively, P = 0.360. Overall complication rate was 43.1% (BMI <25); 43.0% (BMI 25-29.9): and 70.0% (BMI >30) (P = 0.018). The results were similar for both the immediate and the delayed reconstructions. Length of hospital stay was similar in the different BMI groups. Delayed donor-site healing was higher in patients with BMI <25; 17.2%, compared to patients with BMI 25-29.9; 11.8%, but lower than for patients with BMI >30; 29.7% (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION: The DIEP flap provides adequate volume for unilateral breast reconstruction in slim patients, both in immediate and delayed settings. However, in delayed reconstructions slim patients need to be informed about the increased risk of donor-site complications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 36, no 7, 552-558 p.
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-277676DOI: 10.1002/micr.22524ISI: 000387217200004PubMedID: 26529456OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-277676DiVA: diva2:905361
Available from: 2016-02-22 Created: 2016-02-22 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Mani, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mani, Maria
By organisation
Plastic Surgery
In the same journal
Microsurgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 331 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf