uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Total ankle replacement and contralateral ankle arthrodesis in 16 patients from the Swedish Ankle Registry: Self-reported function and satisfaction
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Center for Clinical Research Dalarna. Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, S-79182 Falun, Sweden..
Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, S-79182 Falun, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci & Orthopaed, Lund, Sweden.;Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Malmo, Sweden..
2016 (English)In: Foot and Ankle Surgery, ISSN 1268-7731, E-ISSN 1460-9584, Vol. 22, no 1, 32-34 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Background: Both total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle arthrodesis do show some problems in long-term studies. To choose either of these surgical options is a delicate task. There are no randomized studies reported in the literature and no previous studies in which patients constitute the own controls. Methods: Patients with a TAR and a contralateral ankle arthrodesis were identified in the Swedish Ankle Register. A self-reported foot and ankle specific questionnaire (SEFAS) was sent to these patients who also were asked to report their grade of satisfaction from 1 to 5. Results: The median SEFAS score was 32 (16-44) for the prostheses and 27 (14-47) for the arthrodeses. The median satisfaction score was 2 (1-4) for the prostheses and 2 (1-5) for the arthrodeses. There were no statistically significant difference between the prosthetic side and the fused side regarding these scores. Conclusion: Patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis on one side and had the contralateral ankle replaced, were equally satisfied with both procedures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 22, no 1, 32-34 p.
Keyword [en]
Total ankle replacement, Ankle arthrodesis, Ankle fusion, PROM
National Category
Orthopedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-280232DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.04.007ISI: 000369729500006PubMedID: 26869497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-280232DiVA: diva2:914106
Available from: 2016-03-23 Created: 2016-03-09 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Henricson, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Henricson, Anders
By organisation
Center for Clinical Research Dalarna
In the same journal
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Orthopedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 194 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf