uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls
SOKENDAI Grad Univ Adv Studies, Dept Evolutionary Studies Biosyst, Kamiyamaguchi 1560-35, Hayama, Kanagawa 2400193, Japan.;Rikkyo Univ, Dept Life Sci, Toshima Ku, Nishi Ikebukuro 3-34-1, Tokyo 1718501, Japan..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Animal ecology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience.
Univ Zurich, Anthropol Inst & Museum, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland..
2016 (English)In: Nature Communications, ISSN 2041-1723, E-ISSN 2041-1723, Vol. 7, 10986Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Human language can express limitless meanings from a finite set of words based on combinatorial rules (i.e., compositional syntax). Although animal vocalizations may be comprised of different basic elements (notes), it remains unknown whether compositional syntax has also evolved in animals. Here we report the first experimental evidence for compositional syntax in a wild animal species, the Japanese great tit (Parus minor). Tits have over ten different notes in their vocal repertoire and use them either solely or in combination with other notes. Experiments reveal that receivers extract different meanings from 'ABC' (scan for danger) and 'D' notes (approach the caller), and a compound meaning from 'ABCD' combinations. However, receivers rarely scan and approach when note ordering is artificially reversed ('D-ABC'). Thus, compositional syntax is not unique to human language but may have evolved independently in animals as one of the basic mechanisms of information transmission.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 7, 10986
National Category
Zoology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-283660DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10986ISI: 000371726400001PubMedID: 26954097OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-283660DiVA: diva2:919544
Available from: 2016-04-14 Created: 2016-04-14 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1253 kB)77 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1253 kBChecksum SHA-512
28397948e32e12620331ab138bbdd859b63497ff799b6c374c14b14312fab31cea692af8d00fd792e3d8401a5846efe2e5e71a96f29b3426a1e9be4c0d0de9fe
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Wheatcroft, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wheatcroft, David
By organisation
Animal ecologyDevelopmental Neuroscience
In the same journal
Nature Communications
Zoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 77 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 289 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf