uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Crisis stability or general stability?: Assessing Northeast Asia's absence of war and prospects for liberal transition
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research. Yonsei Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Int Studies, Seoul 120749, South Korea..
2016 (English)In: Review of International Studies, ISSN 0260-2105, E-ISSN 1469-9044, Vol. 42, no 2, 287-309 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

Is the relatively long peace of Northeast Asia a result of crisis stability or general stability? The article introduces two stability concepts - crisis and general stability. Crisis stability occurs when both sides in military crisis are so secure due to its military capability and are able to wait out a surprise attack fully confident that it would be able to respond with a punishing counter attack. On the other hand, general stability prevails when two powers greatly prefer peace even to a victorious war whether crisis stability exists or not, simply because war has become inconceivable as a means of solving any political disagreements and conflicts. While crisis stability entails delicate balance of military power from the deterrence literature of security studies, general stability bases its logic of inquiry on constructivism where the idea of war aversion - categorically rejecting war as a means to end conflicts - becomes the prevailing norm. Therefore, this article empirically examines how Northeast Asia has sustained its peace through crisis stability and presents a new trend toward general stability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 42, no 2, 287-309 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-286649DOI: 10.1017/S0260210515000170ISI: 000372263900005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-286649DiVA: diva2:923815
Available from: 2016-04-27 Created: 2016-04-21 Last updated: 2016-04-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research
In the same journal
Review of International Studies
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 427 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf