uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender Equality Reforms on an Uneven Playing Field: Candidate Selection and Quota Implementation in Electoral Authoritarian Tanzania
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2016 (English)In: Government and Opposition, ISSN 0017-257X, E-ISSN 1477-7053, Vol. 51, no 3, 464-486 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article investigates the dynamics that gender quota reforms create withinand between government and opposition parties in electoral authoritariandominant-party states. A dominant-party state regularly holds relativelycompetitive elections, but the political playing field is skewed in favour of thegovernment party. We investigate the circumstances under which genderquotas’ goal of furthering political gender equality within political parties canbe reconciled with parties’ electoral concerns. We address these issues byanalysing the implementation of reserved seats by the three largest parties inthe dominant-party state of Tanzania. The empirical analysis suggests that theuneven playing field leaves an imprint on the specific priorities parties makewhen implementing candidate selection reforms. Because of large resource gapsbetween parties, the ruling party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi – (CCM), is able toreconcile gender equality concerns with power-maximizing partisan strategies toa greater extent than the opposition parties.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 51, no 3, 464-486 p.
Keyword [en]
political parties, gender quotas, dominant-party states, Tanzania, gender equality, candidate selection, electoral authoritarianism
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-289265DOI: 10.1017/gov.2016.10ISI: 000375947700006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-289265DiVA: diva2:924950
Projects
Political parties and women’s political representation: The role of bureaucratized candidate selection procedures
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 421-2010- 1638
Available from: 2016-04-29 Created: 2016-04-29 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(737 kB)157 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 737 kBChecksum SHA-512
72e0d548e5c75aab0cffdcaa2653bbfa5609d1c004fc23f9a18d57b94d1b15b265c5b603e3ce5875768d8912a9b55a3b73820145032ab7dda121faee185491d7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Bjarnegård, ElinZetterberg, Pär

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bjarnegård, ElinZetterberg, Pär
By organisation
Department of Government
In the same journal
Government and Opposition
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 157 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 415 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf