uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Possible Shielding Effects of Article 27 on Workers' Rights to Information and Consultation in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law.
2016 (English)In: The international journal of comparative labour law and industrial relations, Vol. 32, no 2, 251-273 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A number of EU directives as well as Article 27 in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) deal with workers’ rights to information and consultation in the undertaking. In this article, the added value of including such rights in the EU CFR is discussed. For this purpose, three issues relevant for the interpretation of Article 27 will be addressed. First, to what extent is the rights/principles distinction in the CFR relevant for the legal implications of Article 27 CFR? Second, what conclusions can be drawn from the wording of the Article? Third, what is the impact of the context, or rather to what extent should the development and recognition of rights to information and consultation within other parts of EU law and in the Revised European Social Charter (RESC), affect the interpretation of Article 27 CFR? Two hypothetical situations are examined to establish whether any added value can be detected. The first considers the extent to which Article 27 can act as a shield against attempts by the EU legislator to restrict rights to information and consultation in the existing secondary EU legislation. The second investigates to what extent Article 27 can act as a shield against attempts to restrict national legislation on information and consultation with the support of, for example, Article 16 CFR on Freedom to conduct a business. It is argued that the content of Article 21 RESC should be taken into account when the content of Article 27 is invoked, and that the legality of the restrictions discussed in the hypothetical situations depends on whether they will pass the justification test provided in Article 52.1 CFR. When applying those suggestions, it seems that Article 27 can play a significant role in safeguarding worker’s rights to information and consultation within the EU.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2016. Vol. 32, no 2, 251-273 p.
Keyword [en]
Worker, information, consultation, EU-law, Human rights
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Civil Law; European (Integration) Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-292699OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-292699DiVA: diva2:926452
Available from: 2016-05-06 Created: 2016-05-06 Last updated: 2016-08-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Herzfeld Olsson, Petra
By organisation
Faculty of Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 522 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link