uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding Participatory Governance: An Analysis of Participants' Motives
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0809-8298
2017 (English)In: American Review of Public Administration, ISSN 0275-0740, E-ISSN 1552-3357, Vol. 47, no 5, 538-549 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Despite the growing body of literature on participatory and collaborative governance, little is known about citizens' motives for participation in such new governance arrangements. The present article argues that knowledge about these motives is essential for understanding the quality and nature of participatory governance and its potential contribution to the overall political and administrative system. Survey data were used to explore participants' motives for participating in a large-scale urban renewal program in Stockholm, Sweden. The program was neighborhood-based, characterized by self-selected and repeated participation, and designed to influence local decisions on the use of public resources. Three types of motives were identified among the participants: (a) Common good motives concerned improving the neighborhood in general and contributing knowledge and competence. (b) Self-interest motives reflected a desire to improve one's own political efficacy and to promote the interest of one's own group or family. (c) Professional competence motives represented a largely apolitical type of motive, often based on a professional role. Different motives were expressed by different categories of participants and were also associated with different perceptions concerning program outcomes. Further analysis suggested that participatory governance may represent both an opportunity for marginalized groups to empower themselves and an opportunity for more privileged groups to act as local citizen representatives and articulate the interests of their neighborhoods. These findings call for a more complex understanding of the role and potential benefits of participatory governance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 47, no 5, 538-549 p.
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-292947DOI: 10.1177/0275074015626298ISI: 000403590800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-292947DiVA: diva2:927036
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2009-0052Swedish Research Council Formas, 250-210-105
Available from: 2016-05-10 Created: 2016-05-10 Last updated: 2017-09-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gustafson, PerHertting, Nils
By organisation
Institute for Housing and Urban ResearchDepartment of Government
In the same journal
American Review of Public Administration
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 379 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf