uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5748-0672
2016 (English)In: NanoEthics, ISSN 1871-4757, E-ISSN 1871-4765, 1-17 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The discourse on the fundamental issues raised by synthetic biology, such as biosafety and biosecurity, intellectual property, environmental consequences and ethical and societal implications, is still open and controversial. This, coupled with the potential and risks the field holds, makes it one of the hottest topics in technology assessment today. How a new (bio)technology is perceived by the public influences the manner in which its products and applications will be received. Therefore, it is important to learn how people perceive synthetic biology. This work gathers, integrates and discusses the results of three studies of public perceptions of synthetic biology: (1) an analysis of existing research on how media portray synthetic biology across 13 European countries and in the USA, (2) the Meeting of Young Minds, a public debate between prospective politicians and synthetic biologists in the Netherlands and (3) the experiences of citizen panels and focus groups in Austria, the UK and the USA. The results show that the media are generally positive in their reports on synthetic biology, rather unbalanced in their view of potential benefits (emphasized) and risks (downplayed), and also heavily influenced by the sources of the stories, namely scientists and stakeholders. Among the prospective Dutch politicians, there were positive expectations as well as very negative ones. Some of these positions are also shared by participants in public dialogue experiments, such as not only the demand for information, transparency and regulation but also a sense of resignation and ineluctability of scientific and technological progress.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2016. 1-17 p.
Keyword [en]
Synthetic biology, Public perception, Technology assessment, Media, Public engagement
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-293032DOI: 10.1007/s11569-016-0256-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-293032DiVA: diva2:927208
Synthetic Biology: media portrayal and public understanding
Available from: 2016-05-11 Created: 2016-05-11 Last updated: 2016-05-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ancillotti, Mirko
By organisation
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics
In the same journal
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 118 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link