uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A 1-h Combination Algorithm Allows Fast Rule-Out and Rule-In of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Internal & Emergency Med, Lund, Sweden.;Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lund, Sweden.;Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund, Sweden..
Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund, Sweden.;Helsingborg Gen Hosp, Div Specialised Local Hlth Care, Helsingborg, Sweden..
Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lund, Sweden..
Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lund, Sweden..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ISSN 0735-1097, E-ISSN 1558-3597, Vol. 67, no 13, 1531-1540 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: A 1-h algorithm based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) testing at presentation and again 1 h thereafter has been shown to accurately rule out acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 1-h algorithm when supplemented with patient history and an electrocardiogram (ECG) (the extended algorithm) for predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and to compare it with the algorithm using hs-cTnT alone (the troponin algorithm).

METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, for whom hs-cTnT testing was ordered at presentation. Hs-cTnT results at 1 h and the ED physician's assessments of patient history and ECG were collected. The primary outcome was an adjudicated diagnosis of 30-day MACE defined as acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia, atrioventricular block, cardiac arrest, or death of a cardiac or unknown cause.

RESULTS: In the final analysis, 1,038 patients were included. The extended algorithm identified 60% of all patients for rule-out and had a higher sensitivity than the troponin algorithm (97.5% vs. 87.6%; p < 0.001). The negative predictive value was 99.5% and the likelihood ratio was 0.04 with the extended algorithm versus 97.8% and 0.17, respectively, with the troponin algorithm. The extended algorithm ruled-in 14% of patients with a higher sensitivity (75.2% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.001) but a slightly lower specificity (94.0% vs. 96.4%; p < 0.001) than the troponin algorithm. The rule-in arms of both algorithms had a likelihood ratio >10. CONCLUSIONS A 1-h combination algorithm allowed fast rule-out and rule-in of 30-day MACE in a majority of ED patients with chest pain and performed better than the troponin-alone algorithm.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 67, no 13, 1531-1540 p.
Keyword [en]
acute coronary syndrome, chest pain, diagnosis, myocardial infarction, sensitivity and specificity, unstable angina
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-292997DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.059ISI: 000372893300006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-292997DiVA: diva2:927489
Funder
Region Skåne
Available from: 2016-05-12 Created: 2016-05-11 Last updated: 2016-05-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, Bertil
By organisation
CardiologyUCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center
In the same journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 54 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link