uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Art and the prevention of imagination
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Musicology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1070-0193
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The idea that the experience of art makes use of our imagination is deeply ingrained in Western thinking about all artforms. Indeed, the notion that art stimulates the imaginations of its audiences, spectators and readers is widely promoted as being one of the principle benefits it brings both to societies and individuals. 

 

Certainly, it would be hard to deny that the making of works of art does indeed involve imagination. Making a work of art involves, after all, a degree of invention and a weighing up of possibilities. Describing such a process would arguably necessarily involve reference to something like a concept of imagination. However, our assumption that the consumption of art necessarily involves imagination may be less secure.  My paper argues that while the consumption of art may “stimulate” our imagination in a general sense, the way in we typically experience artworks is marked not by the freeing up of imagination but by its curtailment. That is to say, aesthetic experience is marked not by an increase but by a decrease in imaginative activity.

 

My argument will be pursued as follows. First I will outline a rough working concept of the imagination which aligns a classic definition (Scruton) with the idea that the imagination functions to regulate and improve everyday perception (it arises as a result of our evolved ability to doubt or reflect critically upon our perceptions). Second I will briefly compare the imagination’s role in some examples of everyday perception with some examples of artistic perception drawn from music, film, literature and painting. Third, I will outline an analytic argument according to which aesthetic experience is related to the perception of particular features as necessary and desirable. In this way I claim that states of extreme aesthetic engagement – where we are, for example, “transfixed” or “transported” by a work – require by definition a suspension and curtailment of imaginative activity. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Philosophy
Research subject
Aesthetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-293632OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-293632DiVA: diva2:928084
Conference
Nordic Society of Aesthetics Annual Conference
Available from: 2016-05-14 Created: 2016-05-14 Last updated: 2016-05-14

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dammann, Guy
By organisation
Department of Musicology
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 194 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link