Logo: to the web site of Uppsala University

uu.sePublications from Uppsala University
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rational Choice Theory: Toward a Psychological, Social, and Material Contextualization of Human Choice Behavior
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Uppsala University.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9350-8652
2016 (English)In: Theoretical Economics Letters, ISSN 2162-2078, E-ISSN 2162-2086, Vol. 6, no 2, p. 195-207Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The main purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview of the rational choice approach, followed by an identification of several of the major criticisms of RCT and its conceptual and empirical limitations. It goes on to present a few key initiatives to develop alternative, more realistic approaches which transcend some of the limitations of Rational Choice Theory (RCT). Finally, the article presents a few concluding reflections and a table comparing similarities and differences between the mainstream RCT and some of the initial components of an emerging choice theory. Our method has been to conduct a brief selective review of rational choice theoretical formulations and applications as well as a review of diverse critical literature in the social sciences where rational choice has been systematically criticized. We have focused on a number of leading contributors (among others, several Nobel Prize Recipients in economics, who have addressed rational choice issues). So this article makes no claim for completeness. The review maps a few key concepts and assumptions underpinning the conceptual model and empirical applications of RCT. It reviews also a range of critical arguments and evidence of limitations. It identifies selected emerging concepts and theoretical revisions and adaptations to choice theory and what they entail. The results obtained, based on our literature reviews and analyses, are the identification of several major limitations of RCT as well as selected modifications and adaptations of choice theory which overcome or promise to overcome some of the RCT limitations. Thus, the article with Table 1 in hand provides a point of departure for follow-up systematic reviews and more precise questions for future theory development. The criticisms and adaptations of RCT have contributed to greater realism, empirical relevance, and increased moral considerations. The developments entail, among other things: the now well-known cognitive limitations (“bounded rationality”) and, for instance, the role of satisficing rather than maximizing in decision-making to deal with cognitive complexity and the uncertainties of multiple values; choice situations are re-contextualized with psychology, sociology, economic, and material conditions and factors which are taken into account explicitly and insightfully in empirical and theoretical work. Part of the contextualization concerns the place of multiple values, role and norm contradictions, and moral dilemmas in much choice behavior. In conclusion, the article suggests that the adaptations and modifications made in choice theory have led to substantial fragmentation of choice theory and as of yet no integrated approach has appeared to simply displace RCT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala, 2016. Vol. 6, no 2, p. 195-207
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-294006DOI: 10.4236/tel.2016.62022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-294006DiVA, id: diva2:928490
Available from: 2016-05-16 Created: 2016-05-16 Last updated: 2018-02-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Extending Rational Choice Theory(319 kB)6548 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 319 kBChecksum SHA-512
4f1fba5046b352b63cf8fc8b88aaae3ac7fa03a7e546f30ad6482415e4af0f6da2f7613db56cb96e54f59fdc5de2b1b845241fd62d10fd8705705f4ffc6848b7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Burns, Tom

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Burns, Tom
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Theoretical Economics Letters
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6550 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 10788 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf