uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
State-Building During and After Conflict: Explaining the Roles of Security Sector Reform and Rule of Law on Legitimacy in Two Provinces of Uruzgan and Zabul, Afghanistan
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 80 credits / 120 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The concept of state-building has become a dominant approach to rebuild weak and fragile states and transform their institutions into more legitimate ones. However, in the context of state-building, legitimacy has often been treated as an exogenous phenomenon, ignoring the perspective of the local population. This approach has often led to the creation of western-type institutions, but without much understanding of how the local people would perceive them. This thesis investigates how state-building activities in the forms of Security Sector Reform (SSR) and rule of law enhance legitimacy among the local population. The study argues that when state-building activities are carried out in a more robust fashion and given enough time, the results can positively affect legitimacy. In order to test the theoretical argument, linking SSR and rule of law to legitimacy, the study conducts a structured, focused comparison of two provinces of Afghanistan: Uruzgan and Zabul, where state-building activities took place between 2008 and 2012. The study’s findings support the hypothesis. Levels of legitimacy in Uruzgan were enhanced because there were more robust activities aimed at improving security sector reform and rule of law. On the contrary, Zabul experienced loss in the levels legitimacy because state-building activities were much weaker. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 65 p.
National Category
Humanities Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-294497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-294497DiVA: diva2:930108
Educational program
Master Programme in Peace and Conflict Studies; Master Programme in Peace and Conflict Studies
Examiners
Available from: 2016-06-22 Created: 2016-05-23 Last updated: 2016-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1923 kB)78 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1923 kBChecksum SHA-512
6c8c6a9fa7906fe20c41ff0a1ee143d2edeb382d51489bd52aa2f030164cf4b14f25a5ad3beee75ddd5861307ba7a581d2d1cd9efe5cdb7d40111a4db19d2d42
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research
HumanitiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 78 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 375 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf