uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Biopreservation and Biobanking, ISSN 1947-5535, E-ISSN 1947-5543, Vol. 14, no 3, 241-248 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: There is growing consensus that individual genetic research results that are scientifically robust, analytically valid, and clinically actionable should be offered to research participants. However, the general practice in European research projects is that results are usually not provided to research participants for many reasons. This article reports on the views of European experts and scholars who are members of the European COST Action CHIP ME IS1303 (Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives) regarding challenges to the feedback of individual genetic results to research participants in Europe and potential strategies to address these challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consultation of the COST Action members was conducted through an email survey and a workshop. The results from the consultation were analyzed following a conventional content analysis approach.

RESULTS: Legal frameworks, professional guidelines, and financial, organizational, and human resources to support the feedback of results are largely missing in Europe. Necessary steps to facilitate the feedback process include clarifying legal requirements to the feedback of results, developing harmonized European best practices, promoting interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, designing educational programs and cost-efficient IT-based platforms, involving research ethics committees, and documenting the health benefits and risks of the feedback process.

CONCLUSIONS: Coordinated efforts at pan-European level are needed to enable equitable, scientifically sound, and socially robust feedback of results to research participants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 14, no 3, 241-248 p.
National Category
Bioethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-296189DOI: 10.1089/bio.2015.0115ISI: 000377821800008PubMedID: 27082461OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-296189DiVA: diva2:936537
Funder
EU, European Research Council, 648608Wellcome trust, 096599/2/11/ZEU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme
Available from: 2016-06-14 Created: 2016-06-14 Last updated: 2017-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(201 kB)140 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 201 kBChecksum SHA-512
ced346dfd9bd469effcbc50a0fad40f278c00731afe8a7a7a01cd52ccbd80e7c5be9a1412fa8344b3d5f109ca098d1ce0ca3b72372855a40639f8f132111d828
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Mascalzoni, Deborah

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mascalzoni, Deborah
By organisation
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics
In the same journal
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Bioethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 140 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 500 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf