uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Freezing deliberation through public expert advice
Melbourne University, Australia.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3522-4966
2017 (English)In: Journal of European Public Policy, ISSN 1350-1763, E-ISSN 1466-4429, Vol. 24, no 7, 1006-1026 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When important public issues are debated, many options for government action should be subjected to serious reflection. Constrained discussions over policy options may hamper democratic legitimacy and accountability, and produce decisions that ignore relevant reasons and facts. Hence, constrained deliberation has important consequences for knowledge construction and utilization. We advance theory on ‘epistemic policy learning’ by showing mechanisms that promote expert consensus in external arenas, and that these can hamper deliberation on public policy. Government-appointed experts, in combination with mass media, can ‘freeze’ deliberation by presenting one unified front. Comparison of national print media coverage in Sweden and Denmark during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic offers support. The similar polities enacted different policies: Sweden sought to vaccinate its full population while neighbouring Denmark targeted small groups. Yet experts dominated both public discourses and echoed each other’s support of national policy. In turn, public policy debates were scant in both contexts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 24, no 7, 1006-1026 p.
Keyword [en]
Certified experts or expertise, epistemic communities, evidence-based policy, pandemic influenza, policy deliberation, policy risk or uncertainty, vaccination policy
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-297035DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1170192ISI: 000402015800005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-297035DiVA: diva2:940617
Projects
Civila samhället och den upplysta välfärdsstaten
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2010-2306
Available from: 2016-06-21 Created: 2016-06-21 Last updated: 2017-07-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1925 kB)24 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1925 kBChecksum SHA-512
4950b6000d63c557877a212e7bd71f371351f5d791aa65e7877f112c71a000e781f7fcf23d6c8db0a928d90d29eaf009a95241266609c17fbb1edea7a7a412ca
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Öberg, PerOla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öberg, PerOla
By organisation
Department of Government
In the same journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 69 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 258 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf