uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Likelihood of Modified Audit Opinions: What factors may influence it?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

When auditors detect irregularities within a company, the audit opinion issued that year should be modified. This may be inconvenient for the client who might try to influence the auditor not to issue a modification, thereby compromising auditor independence and thus audit quality. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the four factors audit firm, audit fee, client size, and client financial risk affect the likelihood of auditors issuing a modified audit opinion. Data were gathered from 850 Swedish limited companies of which 425 had received a modified audit opinion. Statistical tests, including logistic regressions, show that client size has a negative relationship with modified audit opinions and some indications are found of differences between the audit firms. The level of audit fee shows no relationship while client financial risk shows a negative relationship with the modification concerning depletion of the shareholders’ equity. The findings imply that larger clients may possess the ability to unduly affect auditors, but auditor independence and audit quality seem to be uniform among the Swedish audit firms and the shareholders’ interests largely protected. Based on the differences found between modifications, future research could benefit from examining additional factors on separate modifications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 52 p.
Keyword [en]
Audit report, Modified audit opinion, Auditor independence, Audit quality
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-297085OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-297085DiVA: diva2:940886
Educational program
Master Programme in Accounting, Auditing and Analysis
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-06-22 Created: 2016-06-21 Last updated: 2016-06-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(8233 kB)228 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 8233 kBChecksum SHA-512
8264e7302bd5e8294aa4649cc5792c0a90ee2f96de9133af6057a0160ecb89518b26c518320f9f64d497e7c227b7e8bc2e77d26c476ef96de90911a393d56e40
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Business Studies
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 228 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 365 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf