uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Lack of Concordance Between Local Investigators, Angiographic Core Laboratory, and Clinical Event Committee in the Assessment of Stent Thrombosis Results From the TRACER Angiographic Substudy
Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA..
Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Vasc Surg, Union Hosp, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China..
Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA..
Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions, ISSN 1941-7640, E-ISSN 1941-7632, Vol. 9, no 5, e003114Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background-Stent thrombosis (ST) is an important end point in cardiovascular clinical trials. Adjudication is traditionally based on clinical event committee (CEC) review of case report forms and source documentation rather than angiograms. However, the degree to which this method of adjudication is concordant with the review of independent angiographic core laboratories (ACLs) has not been studied. This report represents the first assessment of variability between local investigators (LIs), a CEC, and an ACL. Methods and Results-Serial angiograms of 329 patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment-elevation who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at entry in the Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Particpants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER) and who met criteria for possible ST subsequent to the index event were reviewed by an ACL. The ACL was blinded to the assessment by both LIs and the CEC regarding the presence or absence of ST. CEC adjudication was based on Academic Research Consortium definitions of ST, using case report form data and source documents, including catheterization laboratory reports. The ACL, CEC, and LIs agreed on the presence or absence of ST in 52.9% events (kappa=0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.39). The ACL and CEC agreed on 82.7% of events (kappa=0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.67); the ACL and LIs agreed on 61.1% of events (kappa=0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.34); and the CEC and LIs agreed on 62% of events (kappa=0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.36). Conclusions-ST reporting by an ACL, a CEC, and LIs is discordant. The assessment of ST is more often detected by direct review of angiograms by an ACL.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 9, no 5, e003114
Keyword [en]
angiography, clinical trial, interobserver variability, stent, thrombosis
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-298907DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003114ISI: 000376742000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-298907DiVA: diva2:948491
Available from: 2016-07-12 Created: 2016-07-12 Last updated: 2016-07-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallentin, LarsHeld, Claes
By organisation
UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research CenterCardiologyClinical Psychology in Healthcare
In the same journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 64 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link