uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Changes in chlamydia control activities in Europe between 2007 and 2012: a cross-national survey
RIVM Ctr Infect Dis Control Netherlands, Unit Epidemiol & Surveillance, POB 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands..
European Ctr Dis Prevent & Control ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden..
RIVM Ctr Infect Dis Control Netherlands, Unit Epidemiol & Surveillance, POB 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands.;UMC Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands..
Randers Cent Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth, Skovlyvej, Randers, Denmark..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: European Journal of Public Health, ISSN 1101-1262, E-ISSN 1464-360X, Vol. 26, no 3, 382-388 p.Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background: In 2012, the levels of chlamydia control activities including primary prevention, effective case management with partner management and surveillance were assessed in 2012 across countries in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA), on initiative of the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC) survey, and the findings were compared with those from a similar survey in 2007. Methods: Experts in the 30 EU/EEA countries were invited to respond to an online questionnaire; 28 countries responded, of which 25 participated in both the 2007 and 2012 surveys. Analyses focused on 13 indicators of chlamydia prevention and control activities; countries were assigned to one of five categories of chlamydia control. Results: In 2012, more countries than in 2007 reported availability of national chlamydia case management guidelines (80% vs. 68%), opportunistic chlamydia testing (68% vs. 44%) and consistent use of nucleic acid amplification tests (64% vs. 36%). The number of countries reporting having a national sexually transmitted infection control strategy or a surveillance system for chlamydia did not change notably. In 2012, most countries (18/25, 72%) had implemented primary prevention activities and case management guidelines addressing partner management, compared with 44% (11/25) of countries in 2007. Conclusion: Overall, chlamydia control activities in EU/EEA countries strengthened between 2007 and 2012. Several countries still need to develop essential chlamydia control activities, whereas others may strengthen implementation and monitoring of existing activities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 26, no 3, 382-388 p.
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-299055DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv196ISI: 000377470800008PubMedID: 26498953OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-299055DiVA: diva2:948789
Available from: 2016-07-13 Created: 2016-07-13 Last updated: 2016-07-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(451 kB)19 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 451 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Department of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Public Health
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 19 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 38 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link