uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Differences in the oxidative balance of dispersing and non-dispersing individuals: an experimental approach in a passerine bird
Univ Lyon, F-69000 Lyon, France.;Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, UMR5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.;Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Lausanne, Switzerland..
Univ Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7178, Inst Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Dept Ecol Physiol Ethol, Strasbourg, France..
Univ Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7178, Inst Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Dept Ecol Physiol Ethol, Strasbourg, France..
Univ Strasbourg, UPR CNRS 2357, Inst Biol Mol Plantes, Strasbourg, France..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMC Evolutionary Biology, ISSN 1471-2148, E-ISSN 1471-2148, Vol. 16, 125Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

Background: Dispersal is often associated with a suite of phenotypic traits that might reduce dispersal costs, but can be energetically costly themselves outside dispersal. Hence, dispersing and philopatric individuals might differ throughout their life cycle in their management of energy production. Because higher energy expenditure can lead to the production of highly reactive oxidative molecules that are deleterious to the organism if left uncontrolled, dispersing and philopatric individuals might differ in their management of oxidative balance. Here, we experimentally increased flight costs during reproduction via a wing load manipulation in female collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) breeding in a patchy population. We measured the effects of the manipulation on plasmatic markers of oxidative balance and reproductive success in dispersing and philopatric females. Results: The impact of the wing load manipulation on the oxidative balance differed according to dispersal status. The concentration of reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs), a marker of pro-oxidant status, was higher in philopatric than dispersing females in the manipulated group only. Differences between dispersing and philopatric individuals also depended on habitat quality, as measured by local breeding density. In low quality habitats, ROMs as well as nestling body mass were higher in philopatric females compared to dispersing ones. Independently of the manipulation or of habitat quality, plasma antioxidant capacity differed according to dispersal status: philopatric females showed higher antioxidant capacity than dispersing ones. Nestlings raised by philopatric females also had a higher fledging success. Conclusions: Our results suggest that dispersing individuals maintain a stable oxidative balance when facing challenging environmental conditions, at the cost of lower reproductive success. Conversely, philopatric individuals increase their effort, and thus oxidative costs, in challenging conditions thereby maintaining their reproductive success. Our study sheds light on energetics and oxidative balance as possible processes underlying phenotypic differences between dispersing and philopatric individuals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 16, 125
Keyword [en]
Dispersal, Energetic constraint, Breeding density, Doubly-labelled water, Reactive oxygen metabolites, Antioxidant defences, Oxidative stress, Reproductive output, Ficedula albicollis
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-299570DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0697-xISI: 000378044400001PubMedID: 27296460OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-299570DiVA: diva2:949741
Available from: 2016-07-22 Created: 2016-07-22 Last updated: 2016-07-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Animal ecology
In the same journal
BMC Evolutionary Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 10 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link