uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Why do pregnant women accept or decline prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. (Obstetrisk forskning/Skalkidou)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, Centrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD). (Obstetrisk forskning/Skalkidou)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Journal of community genetics, ISSN 1868-310X, Vol. 7, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To investigate if actual knowledge of Down syndrome (DS), influences the decision to accept or decline prenatal diagnosis (PND). Secondary aims were to elucidate reasons for accepting or declining PND and investigate differences between the accepting and declining group in perceived information, knowing someone with DS and thoughts about decision-making. A questionnaire was completed by 76 pregnant women who underwent invasive testing and 65 women who declined tests for chromosomal aberrations in Uppsala, Sweden. Apart from one question no significant differences were found in knowledge of DS between women declining or accepting PND for DS. Both groups had varying and in several respects low levels of knowledge about DS and its consequences. Most common reasons to accept PND were 'to ease my worries' and 'to do all possible tests to make sure the baby is healthy'. Corresponding statements declining PND were 'termination of pregnancy is not an option' and 'because invasive tests increase the risk of miscarriage'. More women declining PND knew someone with DS. Knowledge of DS at these levels is not a major factor when women decide to accept or decline PND for DS. Their choice is mostly based on opinions and moral values.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 7, no 3
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-300828DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0272-6PubMedID: 27438596OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-300828DiVA: diva2:952607
Available from: 2016-08-15 Created: 2016-08-15 Last updated: 2016-08-15

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ternby, EllenAxelsson, OveAnnerén, GöranLindgren, PeterIngvoldstad, Charlotta
By organisation
Obstetrics and GynaecologyCentrum för klinisk forskning i Sörmland (CKFD)Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 52 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link