uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Surface properties of CeO2 from first principles
Uppsala University, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry. Uppsala University, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry, Structural Chemistry. strukturkemi.
Uppsala University, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry. Uppsala University, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry, Structural Chemistry. strukturkemi.
2004 (English)In: Phys. Rev., Vol. B69, 075401-1 – 075401 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The surface energies and electronic structure of (111), (110), and (100) surfaces of CeO2 have been studied using the first-principles projector augmented-wave method within the local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and are compared with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 10 K. Slabs of the same thicknesses were used for the two methods (lamellar three-dimensional boxes in the case of density functional theory and two-dimensional isolated slabs in the MD simulations). The polar (100) surface of CeO2 was modeled as an oxygen-terminated surface with half of the oxygen atoms moved from one surface to the other to fulfill the stoichiometric formula. Among a number of different possible terminations, the checkerboard termination was found to be the most stable. Out of all three low-index surfaces, the (111) surface was found to be the most stable, in agreement with experiment and previous calculations. Our calculated surface energy is 1.0 J/m2 (LDA) and 0.7 J/m2 (GGA). Both values are lower than most calculated surface energies for this surface in the literature, including our present MD results (1.4 J/m2). For (110) our surface energies (LDA, GGA, and MD) are 40%–60% higher than for (111). The structural relaxation is considerably larger for (110) than for (111) and shows excellent agreement between LDA, GGA, and MD. Also the electronic density of states shows larger differences between surface and bulk for the (110) surface than for (111), with, for example, a decrease of the band gap between the valence band (essentially O 2p) and the empty Ce 4f band in the (110) surface region compared to the bulk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. B69, 075401-1 – 075401 p.
National Category
Inorganic Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-67814DOI: doi:10.1103/Phys.RevB69.075401OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-67814DiVA: diva2:95725
Available from: 2006-03-21 Created: 2006-03-21 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v69/e075401

Authority records BETA

Baudin, MicaelHermansson, Kersti

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baudin, MicaelHermansson, Kersti
By organisation
Department of Materials ChemistryStructural Chemistry
Inorganic Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 747 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf