uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hur hittar man den röda tråden?
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Languages, Department of Scandinavian Languages.
2003 (Swedish)In: Språk och lärande/Language and learning: Rapport från ASLA:s höstsymposium Karlstad, 7-8 november 2002, 2003, 10- p.Conference paper, Published paper (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

How do you find the connecting thought in a text?

This study deals with texts written by 19-year-old students in upper-secondary school or students in the corresponding adult education. From a larger corpus I here work with eight texts, expository or argumentative, written within the national test in Swedish. Teachers have stated in a questionnaire on assessment that The connecting thought is one of five criteria with a high ranking when they decide whether to pass a text or not. The object of the study is to find out more about coherence in these school texts.

I have used a model for analysis by Melin (1999), which combines six factors to describe coherence and structure in a text. The factors are: reference cohesion, focus on main cohesive chain, theme-rheme and theme-theme connections, conjunctions and paragraph linking.

The main result is that this combination of coherence factors shows a difference between texts that have passed the test and those that have not passed. The Pass texts reach a higher value on four out of six factors, especially on focus. This is a pleasing result; a text with focus on the most important content is of course better than a confused text without focus.

Can this model for analysis be useful for a larger text corpus? It may be impossible to find a model that is easy to work with and still gives as much information as the sum of the six factors used here. What model can work in the classroom? It is a good thing that teachers see the structure of a text and take it into consideration when grading, but they shall also be able to help students to improve unfocused texts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. 10- p.
Keyword [en]
elevtext, textbindning, gymnasiet, bedömning
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-67894ISBN: 91-87884-16-X (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-67894DiVA: diva2:95805
Available from: 2005-01-25 Created: 2005-01-25

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Östlund-Stjärnegårdh, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Östlund-Stjärnegårdh, Eva
By organisation
Department of Scandinavian Languages
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 288 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf