uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Safety Last?: Raising Issues of Risk Behavior in Medical Treatment Consultations
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. (The Welfare and Life-Course Group, The Uppsala Lab of Economic Sociology)
2016 (English)Conference paper, Abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Medical interventions evaluate and deal with uncertainty and risk in relation to individual patients’ health. In addition, they may also include measures to protect the general public against consequences of individuals’ conditions. Such measures may be inoculation, anti-smoking campaigns, or assessments of patients’ risk behavior. The present study explores how the double agenda of helping individuals and assessing their risk behavior plays out in medical interactions.

The empirical case of this presentation, video-recorded treatment consultations between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients and nurses in Sweden, takes place after a diagnosis is established and doctors and patients have agreed to try a specific treatment. The aim of the encounter is therefore to personalize the treatment and provide a basis for follow-up rather than gaining new information about the patient’s problems. In addition, the consultations include the less patient-focused goal of assessing patients’ risk of falling asleep. OSA is the world’s most common sleep disorder and involves patients’ respiratory airways collapsing during sleep. This often results in recurrent episodes of excessive daytime sleepiness. Consequently, the Swedish Transport Administration states that untreated OSA patients should have their driver’s license confiscated.

The study uses conversation analysis to examine how nurses and patients manage the implications of questions concerning the risk to fall asleep involuntarily. The analysis shows nurses conducting a balancing act between risk work on different scales: gaining information as agents for the state and promoting social solidarity with the patient in front of them. It further shows how the participants raise and attend to expertise and experience as different epistemic domains with accompanying rights and responsibilities. I argue that an understanding of risk work benefits from taking into account how different agendas, epistemic responsibilities, and statuses are negotiated in social interaction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-302607OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-302607DiVA: diva2:958435
Conference
Third ISA Forum of Sociology. The Futures We Want: Global Sociology and the Struggles for a Better World
Available from: 2016-09-07 Created: 2016-09-07 Last updated: 2016-09-07

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Iversen, Clara
By organisation
Department of Sociology
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 21 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link