uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The challenge of integrating innovation and quality management practice
Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för kvalitetsteknik, maskinteknik och matematik.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7409-8966
Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för kvalitetsteknik, maskinteknik och matematik.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9752-6142
Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för kvalitetsteknik, maskinteknik och matematik.
2016 (English)In: Total quality management and business excellence (Online), ISSN 1478-3363, E-ISSN 1478-3371, Vol. 27, no 1-2, 34-47 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Following in the footsteps of ‘New Public Management’, where quality management and quality control have become widely implemented concepts among public authorities, there is now a subsequent government demand to also be innovative. However, integrating and achieving a balance between improved quality and increased innovation is not an easy task. Previous research indicates a complex and ambiguous relation, raising questions as to how to optimally combine these two approaches organisationally, operationally, and culturally. Is there an ‘edge of chaos’ where there is maximal flexibility for innovation while maintaining sufficient order for quality? The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential integration of innovation and quality management practice within the public sector. The paper is based on a multiple case study design, confronted with existing literature, and shows that the current quality management practice is perceived as being related to standardisation, leading to a decrease in the space for innovation. Second, that there is an expectation and belief that innovation and quality management can be handled in parallel and reinforce each other instead of being mutually detrimental.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 27, no 1-2, 34-47 p.
Keyword [en]
quality, innovation, organisational learning, quality management, public sector
National Category
Engineering and Technology Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-302751DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2014.939841ISI: 000374776100003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-302751DiVA: diva2:967441
Available from: 2016-02-23 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2017-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Palm, KlasLilja, JohanWiklund, Håkan
In the same journal
Total quality management and business excellence (Online)
Engineering and TechnologyEconomics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 174 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf