uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Induction of labor in women with a uterine scar
Karolinska Inst, Soder Hosp, Sect Obstet & Gynecol, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Soder Hosp, Sect Obstet & Gynecol, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Soder Hosp, Sect Obstet & Gynecol, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, ISSN 1476-7058, E-ISSN 1476-4954, Vol. 29, no 20, 3286-3291 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of uterine rupture following induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section. Misoprostol was compared to other methods of induction.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 208 women attempting induction of labor after one previous cesarean section. Delivery data were collected retrospectively and compared. Group 1(2009-2010) was compared with Group 2 (2012-2013). In Group 1, the main method of induction was vaginal PGE(2) (prostaglandin-E-2), amniotomy, oxytocin or a balloon catheter. In Group 2, the dominant method of induction was an oral solution of misoprostol. Main outcome measures: frequency of uterine rupture in the two groups.

Results: Nine cases (4.3%) of uterine rupture occurred. There was no significant difference in the frequency of uterine rupture following the change of method of induction from PGE(2), amniotomy, oxytocin or mechanical dilatation with a balloon catheter to orally administered misoprostol (4.1 versus 4.6%, p=0.9). All ruptures occurred in women with no prior vaginal delivery.

Conclusion: The shift to oral misoprostol as the primary method of induction in women with a previous cesarean section did not increase the frequency of uterine rupture in the cohort studied.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 29, no 20, 3286-3291 p.
Keyword [en]
Induction of labor, misoprostol, PGE2, TOLAC, uterine scar
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-302671DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1123242ISI: 000380130200010PubMedID: 26699657OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-302671DiVA: diva2:967456
Available from: 2016-09-08 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2016-09-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åkerud, Helena
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
In the same journal
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link