uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Take It or Leave It: The Threat of Mediation Withdrawal in Internal Conflicts
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Peace and Conflict Research.
2005 (English)In: Paper prepared for presentation at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, HI, USA, March 2-5, 2005Conference paper, Published paper (Other (popular scientific, debate etc.))
Abstract [en]

Mediation theory identifies the threat of mediation withdrawal as a source of leverage and, therefore, as one of the most important prerequisites for success. However, previous research has not examined whether different types of actors differ in their ability to be credible. Not all types of mediators are likely to follow through on a threat of disengagement. I argue that democracies and organisations have internal audiences that reward mediation efforts, regardless of outcome, and therefore, their threats of withdrawal are non-credible. In contrast, non-democratic countries can make their mediation disengagement threats credible, since they do not have to take into account their audience and, therefore, get no positive payoff for being involved in mediation efforts. Hence, non-democratic countries should be expected to outperform democracies and organisations as efficient peace brokers. Using new data on mediation by states and organisations in all intrastate, armed conflict between 1989-2003, the paper examines this argument. The results give support to these claims. Furthermore, an analysis of the contexts in which mediation occur suggests that this correlation is not due to a selection effect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-68955OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-68955DiVA: diva2:96866
Note
Paper prepared for presentation at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, HI, USA, March 2-5Available from: 2007-04-24 Created: 2007-04-24

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Peace and Conflict Research

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 332 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf