uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Motivational interviewing does not affect risk drinking among young women: A randomised, controlled intervention study in Swedish youth health centres
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Sundsvall Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sundsvall, Sweden..
Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Sundsvall, Sweden..
Umea Univ, Dept Clin Sci Obstet & Gynaecol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, ISSN 1403-4948, E-ISSN 1651-1905, Vol. 44, no 6, 611-618 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse risk and binge drinking at 12-month follow-up in young women with risk drinking who received motivational interviewing compared with controls.

Methods: Young women attending Swedish youth health centres were randomised into intervention or control groups. The intervention group members were asked about their alcohol consumption by a midwife/social worker using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption. A score of 5 was used as the cut-off value for risk drinking. Participants with risk drinking in the intervention group received motivational interviewing within the same visit. Participants in the control group had a regular visit with a midwife/social worker and answered the same questions about alcohol consumption in a questionnaire after their visit. A questionnaire with the same questions was administered to participants 12 months after baseline.

Results: Of 1445 eligible young women, 1051 (73%) consented to randomisation and were enrolled in the study. The follow-up rate was 54%. There was a significant decrease in risk- and binge drinking, from baseline to follow-up, in both the intervention and the control groups. Generalised estimating equation analyses demonstrated no significant effect between groups. Of participants who did not have risk drinking at baseline, about 20% in both groups had developed high-risk drinking by the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: No significant differences in risk drinking between young women who received motivational interviewing and controls were found. There was a large intra-individual mobility in young women's risk drinking behaviour. This highlights the importance of finding reliable screening tools that can capture the mobility in drinking behaviour in youth. More research is needed before recommendations can be made.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 44, no 6, 611-618 p.
Keyword [en]
Alcohol drinking, binge drinking, risk drinking, youth, adolescents, motivational interviewing, brief alcohol intervention, randomised controlled trial, treatment outcome
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-302695DOI: 10.1177/1403494816654047ISI: 000380308800013PubMedID: 27289105OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-302695DiVA: diva2:970647
Available from: 2016-09-14 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2016-11-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Studies on routine inquiry about violence victimization and alcohol consumption in youth clinics
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Studies on routine inquiry about violence victimization and alcohol consumption in youth clinics
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Violence victimization is common in youth, and the association between victimization and ill-health is well established. Youth is also the period when alcohol risk drinking is most prevalent. At youth clinics in Västernorrland, Sweden, a randomized controlled intervention was conducted examining health outcomes and risk drinking after implementing routine inquiry about violence victimization and alcohol consumption.

Methods: Participants in the intervention group underwent routine inquiry about violence victimization and alcohol consumption. Victimized participants received empowering strategies and were offered further counseling. Risk drinkers received motivational interviewing (MI). All participants answered questionnaires about sociodemography and health at baseline, at 3 months and at 12 months. Of 1,445 eligible young women, 1,051 (73%) participated, with 54% of them completing the 12-month follow-up. Males were excluded from the quantitative analysis owing to the low number of male participants. Fifteen research interviews examining the experience of routine inquiry were conducted.

Results: Violence-victimized young women reported more ill health than non-victimized women did. This was especially evident for those who had been multiply victimized. There were no differences in health outcomes between the baseline and the 12-month follow-up for the intervention group and for the control group. Of the victimized women in the intervention group, 14% wanted and received further counseling. There was a significant decrease in risk drinking from baseline to follow-up, but no differences between the MI group and the controls. There was a large intra-individual mobility in the young women’s drinking behavior.

In interviews, the participants described how questions about violence had helped them to process prior victimization. For some, this initiated changes such as leaving a destructive relationship or starting therapy. The participants considered risk drinking in terms of consequences and did not find unit-based guidelines useful.

Conclusion: Violence victimization, especially multiple victimization, was strongly associated with ill health in young women. Routine inquiry about violence and subsequent follow-up led to a high degree of disclosure but did not improve self-reported health. However, victimized participants described talking about prior victimization as very helpful. Participants viewed risk drinking in terms of consequences rather than in quantity or frequency of alcohol, which may render unit-based drinking guidelines less useful when addressing risk drinking in youth.  

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2016. 90 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 1279
Keyword
Violence victimization, Youth, Alcohol consumption, Routine Inquiry, Screening, Youth friendly health care, Randomized controlled study, Qualitative study, Våldsutsatthet, Unga, Alkohol, Rutinfrågor, Screening, Ungdomsmottagning, Randomiserad studie, Kvalitativ studier
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-307393 (URN)978-91-554-9756-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-01-12, Rosensalen, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-12-21 Created: 2016-11-14 Last updated: 2016-12-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Palm, AnnaSkalkidou, AlkistisHögberg, Ulf
By organisation
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf