uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Development and Evaluation of a Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Model That Facilitates Opportunistic Gentamicin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neonates and Infants
UCL, Inst Child Hlth, Inflammat Infect & Rheumatol Sect, London, England..
St Georges Univ London, Inst Infect & Immun, Paediat Infect Dis Res Grp, London, England..
Univ Tartu, Dept Microbiol, Tartu, Estonia..
Univ Tartu, Dept Microbiol, Tartu, Estonia..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, ISSN 0066-4804, E-ISSN 1098-6596, Vol. 60, no 8, 4869-4877 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Trough gentamicin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is time-consuming, disruptive to neonatal clinical care, and a patient safety issue. Bayesian models could allow TDM to be performed opportunistically at the time of routine blood tests. This study aimed to develop and prospectively evaluate a new gentamicin model and a novel Bayesian computer tool (neoGent) for TDM use in neonatal intensive care. We also evaluated model performance for predicting peak concentrations and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 h to time t h (AUC(0-t)). A pharmacokinetic meta-analysis was performed on pooled data from three studies (1,325 concentrations from 205 patients). A 3-compartment model was used with the following covariates: allometric weight scaling, postmenstrual and postnatal age, and serum creatinine concentration. Final parameter estimates (standard errors) were as follows: clearance, 6.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg of body weight; central volume (V), 26.5 (0.6) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q), 2.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V2, 21.2 (1.5) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q2), 0.3 (0.05) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V3, 148 (52.0) liters/70 kg. The model's ability to predict trough concentrations from an opportunistic sample was evaluated in a prospective observational cohort study that included data from 163 patients and 483 concentrations collected in five hospitals. Unbiased trough predictions were obtained; the median (95% confidence interval [CI]) prediction error was 0.0004 (-1.07, 0.84) mg/liter. Results also showed that peaks and AUC(0-t) values could be predicted (from one randomly selected sample) with little bias but relative imprecision, with median (95% CI) prediction errors being 0.16 (-4.76, 5.01) mg/liter and 10.8 (-24.9, 62.2) mg center dot h/liter, respectively. neoGent was implemented in R/NONMEM and in the freely available TDMx software.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 60, no 8, 4869-4877 p.
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-303286DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00577-16ISI: 000380792600051PubMedID: 27270281OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-303286DiVA: diva2:971333
Available from: 2016-09-16 Created: 2016-09-15 Last updated: 2016-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nielsen, Elisabet I.
By organisation
Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
In the same journal
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Pharmacology and Toxicology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 3 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link