Broome's Argument against Value Incomparability
2004 (English)In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, Vol. 16, no 2, 220-224 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
John Broome has argued that alleged cases of value incomparability are really examples of vagueness in the betterness relation. The main premiss of his argument is ‘the collapsing principle’. I argue that this principle is dubious, and that Broome’s argument is therefore unconvincing.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 16, no 2, 220-224 p.
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-70141OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-70141DiVA: diva2:98052