uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Broome's Argument against Value Incomparability
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy. praktisk filosofi.
2004 (English)In: Utilitas, ISSN 0953-8208, Vol. 16, no 2, 220-224 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

John Broome has argued that alleged cases of value incomparability are really examples of vagueness in the betterness relation. The main premiss of his argument is ‘the collapsing principle’. I argue that this principle is dubious, and that Broome’s argument is therefore unconvincing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 16, no 2, 220-224 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-70141OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-70141DiVA: diva2:98052
Available from: 2005-04-15 Created: 2005-04-15 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://journals.cambridge.org

Authority records BETA

Carlson, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlson, Erik
By organisation
Department of Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 356 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf