uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Leis-Peters, Annette
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Uppsala Religion and Society Research Centre.
    Hidden by Civil Society and Religion?: Diaconal Institutions as Welfare Providers in the Growing Swedish Welfare State2014In: Journal of Church and State, ISSN 0021-969X, E-ISSN 2040-4867, Vol. 56, no 1, p. 105-127Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Lindberg, Jonas
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Uppsala Religion and Society Research Centre.
    Renegotiating the Role of Majority Churches in Nordic Parliamentary Debates on Same-Sex Unions2016In: Journal of Church and State, ISSN 0021-969X, E-ISSN 2040-4867, Vol. 58, no 1, p. 80-97Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this article, a case study is used to analyse how the position of the majority churches is expressed in Nordic parliamentary debates on same-sex unions and to discuss the results in relation to theories on functional differentiation contextualised through socio-cultural factors. In the study, the degree of references to the majority churches in the debates is analysed and to what degree Members of Parliament support the role of the majority churches as performers of legally binding weddings. It is also analysed to what degree the majority churches directly and indirectly are used as authorities to strengthen the claims for or against same-sex unions. In the conclusion, these debates are understood as a re-negotiation of the role of the majority churches due to their ability to continuously function through performance and as public utilities. Meanwhile, socio-cultural factors are also used to explain differences in how the role of the majority churches is referred to in the parliamentary debates on same-sex unions in the different countries. 

1 - 2 of 2
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf