uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 7 of 7
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Ahrne, Göran
    et al.
    Stockholm Univ, Sociol, Stockholm, Sweden..
    Brunsson, Nils
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Seidl, David
    Univ Zurich, Dept Business Adm, Management & Org, Zurich, Switzerland..
    On the fruitfulness of the concept of partial organization: A rejoinder to Apelt et al2017In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 35, no 3, p. 297-299Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This short paper responds to Apelt et al.'s (2017) comments on Ahrne et al.'s (2016) proposal of extending the concept of organization to any decided social orders and thereby putting organization studies at the centre of the social sciences. We highlight some misunderstandings about the aims of this proposal and discuss Apelt et al.'s own proposal of re-focusing organization studies on formal organizations based on Niklas Luhmann's systems theory.

  • 2. Ahrne, Göran
    et al.
    Brunsson, Nils
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Seidl, David
    Resurrecting Organization by Going Beyond Organizations2016In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 34, no 2, p. 93-101Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This essay is motivated by two related observations about the field of organization studies. First, organization studies researchers have traditionally been good at importing ideas from other areas of research but poor at exporting their own ideas to other fields. Second, even within the field of organization studies, interest in organizations has decreased over the past decades as organization scholars have turned away from organizations to address such other phenomena as institutions or networks. Both developments are undermining the significance of organization studies as a distinctive field of research, the insights of which are necessary for understanding modern society. In this essay, we elaborate on recent suggestions by distinctively European scholars for strengthening concern for the particularities of organization in social theorizing. The first suggestion is to move decisions back to the core of the field. The second suggestion is to extend the notion of organization beyond organizations. We illustrate these two moves with examples from the literature and discuss implications for the future of organization studies.

  • 3.
    Brunsson, Nils
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    On the fruitfulness of the concept of partial organization:: A rejoinder to Apelt et al2017In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 35, no 3, p. 297-299Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This short paper responds to Apelt et al.’s (2017) comments on Ahrne et al.'s (2016) proposal of extending the concept of organization to any decided social orders and thereby putting organization studies at the centre of the social sciences. We highlight some misunderstandings about the aims of this proposal and discuss Apelt et al.’s own proposal of re-focusing organization studies on formal organizations based on Niklas Luhmann's systems theory.

  • 4.
    Iveroth, Einar
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Leading global IT-enabled change across cultures2012In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 30, no 4, p. 340-351Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper explores, from a practice-based departure, the question of how global companies lead IT-enabled transformation across cultures. The paper examines the change management practices incorporated by the leading telecommunications company Ericsson in the transformation of its finance and accounting (F&A) unit. The findings suggest that a practice-based culture can make global transformation projects easier to accomplish, and that IT can reinforce such a culture. However, the findings also shows how the intangible structure of practice-based culture and the tangible structure IT supplies a foundation to build on, but require additional resources that are more situated, social and human oriented to be successful. Overall this paper offers a new perspective of IT-enabled change across cultures by developing the analytical concepts of common ground, common meaning and common interest.

  • 5.
    Iveroth, Einar
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Westelius, Alf
    Linköping University.
    Petri, Carl-Johan
    Linköping University.
    Olve, Nils-Göran
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies. Linköping University.
    Cöster, Mathias
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Nilsson, Fredrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    How to differentiate by price: Proposal for a five-dimensional model2013In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 31, no 2, p. 109-123Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this article is to analyse the repertoire of possible price models that organisations may deploy for their products and services. This is attained by developing the SBIFT model that suggests that organisations can differentiate by price along five dimensions. Previous research on pricing has been dispersed across different academic disciplines. This article offers a more integrated perspective, derived from earlier theory as well as discussions in a collaborative research project with the international telecom company Ericsson. The model can be used as a tool for price modelling in a descriptive and prescriptive sense. Altogether, this article uncovers implicit features of price models, and by doing so it illustrates how an organisation can differentiate and re-invent their offering based on price.

  • 6.
    Iveroth, Einar
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Westelius, Alf
    Linköpings Universitet.
    Petri, Carl-Johan
    Linköpings Universitet.
    Olve, Nils-Göran
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    Cöster, Mathias
    Gotland University, School of the Humanities and Social Science.
    Nilsson, Fredrik
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Business Studies.
    How to Differentiate by Price: Proposal for a Five-dimensional Model2013In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 31, no 2, p. 109-123Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The purpose of this article is to analyse the repertoire of possible price models that organisations may deploy for their products and services. This is attained by developing the SBIFT model that suggests that organisations can differentiate by price along five dimensions. Previous research on pricing has been dispersed across different academic disciplines. This article offers a more integrated perspective, derived from earlier theory as well as discussions in a collaborative research project with the international telecom company Ericsson. The model can be used as a tool for price modelling in a descriptive and prescriptive sense. Altogether, this article uncovers implicit features of price models, and by doing so it illustrates how an organisation can differentiate and re-invent their offering based on price.

  • 7.
    Runfola, Andrea
    et al.
    Univ Perugia, Dept Econ, Via Pascoli 20, I-06123 Perugia, Italy..
    Perna, Andrea
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Industrial Engineering & Management. Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Management, Ple Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy..
    Baraldi, Enrico
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Industrial Engineering & Management.
    Gregori, Gian Luca
    Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Management, Ple Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy..
    The use of qualitative case studies in top business and management journals: A quantitative analysis of recent patterns2017In: European Management Journal, ISSN 0263-2373, E-ISSN 1873-5681, Vol. 35, no 1, p. 116-127Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The use of case studies as qualitative research strategy in social sciences seems to have increased recently, but there are no studies that empirically verify such claim. By explicitly focusing on the field of business and management studies, we aim to investigate the extent of publication and the main features of qualitative case studies published in the 20 highest impact factor business and management journals. The paper discusses the correlation between a journal's ranking and the extent of case studies it published, and between selected features of case studies (e.g. research purpose, design and data sources). Moreover, we shed light on how the identified features of a case study impact its probability of being published. Methodologically, we analyse by means of correlation and regression statistics, as well as clustering techniques a total of 19 features in the 352 qualitative case studies published between 2002 and 2011 in our sample of top business and management journals.

1 - 7 of 7
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf