uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
Refine search result
1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Götz, Elias
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies.
    In the hegemon’s shadow: leading states and the rise of regional powers2016In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 2, no 4, p. 448-450Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 2.
    Götz, Elias
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies.
    The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities2019In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 5, no 2, p. 187-189Article, book review (Refereed)
  • 3.
    Simons, Greg
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies.
    Aspects of Putin's appeal to international publics2015In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479, Vol. 1, no 2, p. 205-208Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Simons, Greg
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies.
    Debating public diplomacy: now and next2020In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479Article, book review (Other academic)
  • 5.
    Simons, Greg
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Uppsala Centre for Russian and Eurasian Studies.
    Islamic extremism and the war for hearts and minds2016In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article seeks to explore the extremist publications Inspire (Al Qaeda) and Dabiq(Islamic State) English-language editions, to deconstruct the information in order to see how they attempt to appeal to publics in the Western world. Four issues of each are examined and reveal a number of similarities in approach. The emphasis of the communication is via a negative political campaign against the West and its allies, rather than a comprehensive positive campaign on what the organisations offer in place of the existing system (with the exception of a “pure” Islamic state). Although from an outsider’s perspective, these maybe both brands of extreme terrorist organisations, in addition to some similarities in norm and value based appeals (for example, on senses injustice and pure Islam) there are some discernible differences seen in the nature of their external communication. Inspire “permits” a certain independence of effort, ISIS tries to carefully protects its brand and not encourage any independence of effort.

  • 6.
    Simons, Greg
    et al.
    Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies. Turiba University, Riga, Latvia.
    Manoilo, Andrey
    Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
    Trunov, Philipp
    Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences (INION) RAS, Moscow, Russia.
    Sweden and the NATO debate: views from Sweden and Russia2019In: Global Affairs, ISSN 2334-0460, E-ISSN 2334-0479Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Sweden is a country that has a reputation and historical legacy as being “neutral” and working for peaceful solutions to different global problems after the bitter experiences in the 18th and 19th centuries that saw it fall as a regional power of the Baltic Sea region in a series of conflicts with the Russian Empire. Contemporary mainstream politics and society places itself firmly in the camp of global liberalism and the stressing the importance of the trans-Atlantic partnership, which influences how Sweden views its mission and approach to global affairs. Sweden’s centuries long policy of neutrality/non-alignment is being tested in an environment of deteriorating relations with Russia. This is most clearly seen in the NATO debate where a noticeable split is taking place in society along the lines of humanitarian values (those supporting neutrality/non-alignment) and “interests” (namely supposed security interests by the pro-NATO side).

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf