Alteration in the gastrointestinal (GI) motility and transit comprises an important component of the functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Available animal GI motility and transit models are to study symptoms (delayed gastric emptying, constipation, diarrhea) rather than biological markers to develop an effective treatment that targets the underlying mechanism of altered GI motility in patients. Animal data generated from commonly used methods in human like scintigraphy, breath test and wireless motility capsule may directly translate to the clinic. However, species differences in the control mechanism or pharmacological responses of GI motility may compromise the predictive and translational value of the preclinical data to human. In this review we aim to provide a summary on animal models used to mimic GI motility alteration in FGID, and the impact of the species differences in the physiological and pharmacological responses on the translation of animal GI motility and transit data to human.
By administering an anaerobic cultivated human intestinal microbiota (ACHIM) via upper gastrointestinal route using endoscopy we aimed to rectify intestinal dysbiosis and simultaneously achieve a treatment response in IBS patients. The study population fulfilled the Rome III IBS criteria and comprised 50 patients. During 10 days, patients recorded the irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS) along with the Bristol stool scale and number of stools/day. The enrolled patients were categorized as follows: 37 with diarrhea, 5 with constipation and 8 with mixed symptoms. The treatment response showed reduction in a majority of patients, 32 of which with 50-point reduction of IBS-SSS and 21 with a 100-point IBS-SSS reduction. The percentage improvement was 36 (23-49) and 28 (18-38) for women and men respectively. Short-chain fatty acids were not changed. We consider fecal microbiota transplantation in the form of ACHIM as an option for the future therapeutic armamentarium in IBS. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal symptom complex defined by abdominal pain and disturbed bowel habits over 3 months within a period of 6 months, in absence of any identifiable organic pathology. Over the years, speculations of the pathophysiology of IBS has moved from elusive central nervous symptoms impinging on psychosomatic disease, to objective signs of intestinal fermentation with abdominal bloating and intestinal dysmotility. The specific subgroup of post infectious IBS is of special interest since it opens the possibility of dysbiosis as the pivotal point for development of IBS in association with traveler's diarrhea or antibiotic treatment with ensuing dysbiosis and abdominal symptoms that may resolve over decades. The undefined disease mechanisms that take place within the gut seem responsible for the gut-brain signaling leading to activation of brain centers that drive the clinical picture of IBS, further modulated by the patient's social background and previous lifetime events. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Functional gastrointestinal disorders are the most common disorders encountered in the clinical gastroenterology setting. Over the years the Rome process has generated consensus definitions of functional gastrointestinal disorders, and given diagnostic criteria, based on various symptom patterns, that have evolved over the years. The latest Rome IV consensus was presented in May 2016. This summary points out some of the important changes made from the Rome III 2006 consensus including evaluation of symptoms from the stand-point of basal normative values and disorders of gut-brain interaction, as well as additions of the importance of the microflora. However, we are all aware of the fact that there are limitations, and the Rome consensus does not pick up all patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Out of those that seek medical help for their functional gastrointestinal symptoms additional outlines of disease have to be considered and judgements made on the patients' actual symptoms, or rather presentation of their symptoms. The Rome IV consensus is a robust standard for a clinical and research approach to functional gastrointestinal disorders, but might be improved by use of exclusion criteria and additional biochemical biomarkers in order to accurately diagnose those patients who may achieve relief by an extended treatment approach in the clinical setting of gastroenterology. A biopsychosocial approach to the patient is recommended to improve compliance and optimize treatment and outcomes. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
While there is ongoing discussion about the details of implementation of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES), there appears to be a consensus amongst geneticists that the widespread use of these approaches is not only inevitable, but will also be beneficial [1]. However, at the present time, we are unable to anticipate the full range of uses, consequences and impact of implementing WGS and WES. Nevertheless, the already known ethical issues, both in research and in clinical practice are diverse and complex and should be addressed properly presently. Herein, we discuss the ethical aspects of WGS and WES by particularly focussing on three overlapping themes: (1) informed consent, (2) data handling, and (3) the return of results.
Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with very varying clinical expression. A functioning NET, for instance in the pancreas, may be very small and yet give rise to severe endocrine symptoms whereas a patient with a small bowel tumour may present with diffuse symptoms and disseminated disease with a palpable bulky liver. Imaging of NETs is therefore challenging and the imaging needs in the various patients are diverse. The basic modalities for NET imaging are computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in combination with somatostatin receptor imaging (SMI) by scintigraphy with 111In-labelled octreotide (OctreoScan) or more recently by positron emission tomography (PET) with 68Ga-labelled somatostatin analogues. In this review these various morphological and functional imaging modalities and important methodological aspects are described. Imaging requirements for the various types of NETs are discussed and typical image findings are illustrated.
The number of disorders now linked to increased intestinal mucosal permeability implies that a substantial percent of the population is affected. Drug interventions targeting reduced tight junctional permeability are being pursued. Although hyper-permeability in itself is not a clinically recognized disease entity, its relationship to disease processes has driven interest in measuring, and even monitoring mucosal permeability in vivo. Along with improved knowledge of gut barrier physiology, advances have been made in tests and biomarkers of barrier function. Drawing from our experiences in the past decade, considerations and challenges faced in assessing in vivo intestinal permeability are discussed herein, along with indications of what the future might hold.
Biological treatment for GI neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) includes treatment with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons. Both of these therapies were developed in the early 1980's and initially for treatment of a carcinoid syndrome in patients with small intestinal NETs. Later on tumour biology studies indicated that well differentiated NETs (G1-tumours) benefit from treatment with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons. Both agents give symptomatic improvement in patients with functioning tumours in 40-60% of the patients, biochemical responses in 50-70% of the patients and significant tumour shrinkage in 5-10% of the patients. Combination therapy with somatostatin analogues and alpha interferon has demonstrated some clinical benefit. In conclusion: Somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons are still playing an important role and considered to be first-line treatment in functioning and in non-functioning well-differentiated NETs, (G1-tumours) and somatostatin analogues might also be applied to control clinical symptoms in G2-tumours with higher proliferation.